Re: Entropy confusion, please help!
- From: noshellswill <noshellswill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:28:00 GMT
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:48:04 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
<clip>
Likewise, I think of the state of affairs immediately following the
"big bang" as a whole lot more chaotic than the absolute thermal
uniformity of a Universe that, some time far in the distant future,
has reached "absolute equilibrium"
Here it gets hard. As far as I have understood, the answer is that the
universe right after the big bang did have a fair amount of disorder
regarding the _movement_, but back then there wasn't much space to be
disorderly _in_, so the _position_ of things was fairly constrained,
leading to a very low entropy all in all.
HM:
Penrose ( R2R ) does NOT this size/entropy_increase explanation at all.
Surely, I'll be ---NOT EVEN WRONG--- in presenting his view, but ... he
appears to divide entropy contributions into those of Weyl_geometry [ a
huge spacial curvature contributor , and zero at t==0 ) ] and a tiny
entropy contributed by photons/particles.
The enlarging phase_space available to photons ( as the universe expands
) remains insignificant compared to Weyl entropy.
**REM** Somebody kindly -- who knows what they are talking about -- set
out this issue conflict clearly.
nss
**********
.
- References:
- Entropy confusion, please help!
- From: Uno Lapideus
- Re: Entropy confusion, please help!
- From: Henning Makholm
- Entropy confusion, please help!
- Prev by Date: Re: Pluto needs your assistance.
- Next by Date: Re: Entropy confusion, please help!
- Previous by thread: Re: Entropy confusion, please help!
- Next by thread: Re: Entropy confusion, please help!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|