Re: 100 Years of E=mc2


PD wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:

Good one :-)

But there is a Law of Conservation of Stupidity.
Just watch him.

Glad to see you're back, by the way.

Dirk Vdm
-------------------------------------
to all the imbecil parrots

there is no law of conservation of this chemical element of the other
but there is a law of conseravtion of MASS

No, actually, there's not.
----------------
you ignored the rest of that post

in mc^2 =E
there are ONLY TWO PHYSICSL ENTITIES

one is m the other is c^2
if m is meaningless you have that th e most meaninful element in
mc^2
is the c^2 ??
so what is the roll; m there if it is nonexistat than you can
write

E=c^2 and thats all why bother etering there the negligable m ??
or something that you catuallt dont know what is its meaning ??
----------------------------

TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------------------

enery i s mass in motion !1
got it imbecil Van der shamatte ??

do you have something behind your eys in your dumb skull
if yess just have a look at the famous formula

E=mc^2 do you see some m there imbecil ?

got is imbecill? so what is that m there ???!!!
no chance fo r a disturbed retard !!
----------------------
Y.P
-----------------------------

.

Relevant Pages