Re: 100 Years of E=mc2


PD wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
PD wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:

Good one :-)

But there is a Law of Conservation of Stupidity.
Just watch him.

Glad to see you're back, by the way.

Dirk Vdm
-------------------------------------
to all the imbecil parrots

there is no law of conservation of this chemical element of the other
but there is a law of conseravtion of MASS

No, actually, there's not.
----------------
you ignored the rest of that post

in mc^2 =E
there are ONLY TWO PHYSICSL ENTITIES

one is m the other is c^2
if m is meaningless you have that th e most meaninful element in
mc^2
is the c^2 ??
so what is the roll; m there if it is nonexistat than you can
write

E=c^2 and thats all why bother etering there the negligable m ??
or something that you catuallt dont know what is its meaning ??

I didn't say it didn't have any meaning. I said there is no such law as
conservation of mass.
If I take a look at low-speed KE = (1/2)mv^2, the v has a specific
meaning, but there is no conservation of velocity.
If I take a look at Newton's 2nd law F=ma, the a has a specific
meaning, but there is no conservation of acceleration.

Do not overassume what you cannot assume.

PD
-------------------
wow waht a quick answer
as if in live conversation

now
if m i s always in energy it means it is always there !!!
c is consatnt
E is conserved so ..---------...
m is conserved as well
dont you see that ??
if m was not conserved E would not be conserved as well !!
because it is not enough that c alone will be conserved
(sorry if it was a quick answer as well
do i make sense ??

TIA
Y.Porat
------------------------

.

Relevant Pages