Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Sep 2006 02:40:51 -0700
Y.Porat wrote:
[...]
so you claim thjat E=mc^2 is not universal ???
(where is it wrong ??)
When there is motion. [E=mc^2 is a special case]
When photons are being considered. [E=mc^2 is wrong for photons]
When the measurment takes place in a strong gravitational field. [SR
only applies locally]
Or any combination thereof.
Remember Porat, you are not and never were a physicist.
If you were actually an engineer as you say you were, go post somewhere
else. Go share any actual engineering knowledge you have with
engineering newsgroups and leave physics newsgroups to those who
actually understand physics.
ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- References:
- 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: physics . einstein
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- 100 Years of E=mc2
- Prev by Date: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation of Value
- Previous by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- Next by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
