Re: 100 Years of E=mc2


Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:

[...]

so you claim thjat E=mc^2 is not universal ???
(where is it wrong ??)

When there is motion. [E=mc^2 is a special case]

so ???

When photons are being considered. [E=mc^2 is wrong for photons]-

imbecil !!
that doe snot underdtand hoew a fiormula is built andwaht is its
meaning

----------
When the measurment takes place in a strong gravitational field. [SR
only applies locally]

that is another profe idiot imbecil that th ephoton has mass

2 it means tha t youdont know what is happening in a strong
gravitational field
-----------

Or any combination thereof.

what do you know abou tthose combinations crook ??be more spsecifi
Nazi ***
it is not good enough jsut to hand wave !!!
do you think shitty that you are impersing anyone by your
demagogic systems ??
do you think it will make you a less zero scintist parrot ??

waht is your day job??
waht is your innovation to physics ?
wHat is your unprecedented contributiuons to Nazi demagogue

no one gives apiss at you.
----------



Remember Porat, you are not and never were a physicist.
--------------
who the *** nominated you here to be thge super supervisor of that
ng??
waht is you qualification for that
waht is your AOUTHORITY FOR THAT
beside your being a nazi *** ::!!!


did anyone beside a rude idiot like you ever demanded
someone else toleave that ng?
not to mensin tha tyou are an idiot parrot phjysicist!!
-------------

If you were actually an engineer as you say you were, go post somewhere
else. Go share any actual engineering knowledge you have with
engineering newsgroups and leave physics newsgroups to those who
actually understand physics.
---------------
let human being to reply !!!

i was not adressing nazi animals

and no one nominated a fucher shitter like you to be
go *** youself with Golsed Boare that apprently is one of your many
schitzo names disturbed animal .

Y.P
---------------------------

.

Loading