Re: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma


physicsajay wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
physicsajay wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
physicsajay wrote:
Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma

Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically
analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
special conditions only. Thus it is extended to dE=Ac2dm This work
is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW and also
presented in international conferences in USA and ENGLAND.

Ok.

What journals, what conferences?

[yawn]

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
The weblink of the proceedings where work is published can also sent
if required.

I ask again:

What journals, what conferences?


AJAY SHARMA

======Ajay Sharma responds=
I have given you the link along with paper.
I again give the link
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

This paper is published in journal
Physics Essays
www.physicsessays.com

"Different points of view will be accepted as long as they are
logically sound and well balanced in their exposition, until the
process of truth searching naturally reaches a stage of a convincing
argument in favour of one point of view or the other. "

So they don't care if is right or wrong, so long as it is "logically
sound". Whatever the hell that means.

I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/adring/

They can't even afford a DOMAIN NAME. Off to an excellent start.

"Galilean Electrodynamics aims to publish high-quality scientific
papers that discuss challenges to accepted orthodoxy in physics,
especially in the realm of relativity theory, both special and general.
In particular, the journal seeks papers arguing that Einstein's
theories are unnecessarily complicated, have been confirmed only in a
narrow sector of physics, lead to logical contradictions, and are
unable to derive results that must be postulated, though they are
derivable by classical methods."

HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Nice choices of journals.

Nobody is ever going to take you seriously for a few reasons:

1) You are published in shitty, shitty journals that nobody with a
brain larger than a apple will read.

2) You obviously are in this to sell your book, not to advance
knowledge. You had your book up for sale long before you were published
anywhere, and the places you got published in do not have any real
scientific standards.

3) Most importantly of all, your work is worthless because it is wrong.

In parts it is published in various others journals.
Conferences.
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------------few of them--------------
Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Reserach and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Foth Worh Texas, USA
A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems (
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organiser Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Wrawick , ENGALND
A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conferences , OXFORD
ENGLAND
A. Sharma, . Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81

Any thing else let me know. Email physicsajay@xxxxxxxxx
AJAY SHARMA

.

Loading