Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Sep 2006 15:11:17 -0700
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
[...]
so you claim thjat E=mc^2 is not universal ???
(where is it wrong ??)
When there is motion. [E=mc^2 is a special case]
so ???
You asked me where E=mc^2 is wrong, idiot.
When photons are being considered. [E=mc^2 is wrong for photons]-
imbecil !!
that doe snot underdtand hoew a fiormula is built andwaht is its
meaning
Since you have no education in physics and have proven you do not
understand SR, I consider that a very bold position to take.
----------
When the measurment takes place in a strong gravitational field. [SR
only applies locally]
that is another profe idiot imbecil that th ephoton has mass
Who was talking about photons, moron? I wasn't.
2 it means tha t youdont know what is happening in a strong
gravitational field
I know a hell of a lot more about it than you. This is the subject I am
studying in a university setting, and it is the subject I want to spend
a long time learning about.
You say you were an engineer. No engineering program has any reason to
teach general or even special relativity to engineers. Go ahead, tell
me where you learned GR and SR. Do you even know?
-----------
Or any combination thereof.
what do you know abou tthose combinations crook ??be more spsecifi
Nazi ***
Weee!
it is not good enough jsut to hand wave !!!
do you think shitty that you are impersing anyone by your
demagogic systems ??
do you think it will make you a less zero scintist parrot ??
It is spelled "scientist", you ineducable ***. How many goddamn times
will it take for you to learn it is spelled SCIENTIST? You can't even
grasp the spelling of a common 9 letter English word, what makes you
think you can argue relativity?
waht is your day job??
waht is your innovation to physics ?
wHat is your unprecedented contributiuons to Nazi demagogue
I'm a student, you worthless human being.
I'm taking 18 credit hours this semester. I spend 21 hours a week *just
in class*, and approximately that much doing homework and studying.
When was the last time YOU were in university? Was it more or less than
50 years ago?
no one gives apiss at you.
----------
--------------
Remember Porat, you are not and never were a physicist.
who the *** nominated you here to be thge super supervisor of that
ng??
waht is you qualification for that
waht is your AOUTHORITY FOR THAT
beside your being a nazi *** ::!!!
did anyone beside a rude idiot like you ever demanded
someone else toleave that ng?
not to mensin tha tyou are an idiot parrot phjysicist!!
An "idiot parrot physicist" is still more of a physicist than you will
ever be, at this point.
Your English is atrocious. You are incapable of spelling a word larger
than 4 letters correctly.
-------------
---------------
If you were actually an engineer as you say you were, go post somewhere
else. Go share any actual engineering knowledge you have with
engineering newsgroups and leave physics newsgroups to those who
actually understand physics.
let human being to reply !!!
i was not adressing nazi animals
and no one nominated a fucher shitter like you to be
go *** youself with Golsed Boare that apprently is one of your many
schitzo names disturbed animal .
Sorry Porat, you are not worth the effort. I don't need to use
different names to annoy you, all I have to do is point out that you
were never a physicist and are incapable of even learning simple
English to make you mad.
Gosh, isn't that sad? You pretend to be an authority on all things in
physics yet you have no education to show for it, and your mind is so
porous that even simple things like the spelling of the word "photon"
go right through one ear and out the other.
Y.P
---------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- References:
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: PD
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- Prev by Date: Re: On Sale: Fudamentals of Physics:6th Edition(Extended).
- Next by Date: Re: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
- Previous by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- Next by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
- Index(es):