Re: Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma


Sam Wormley wrote:
physicsajay wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
physicsajay wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
physicsajay wrote:
Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma

Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically
analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
special conditions only. Thus it is extended to dE=Ac2dm This work
is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW and also
presented in international conferences in USA and ENGLAND.
Ok.

What journals, what conferences?

[yawn]
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
The weblink of the proceedings where work is published can also sent
if required.
I ask again:

What journals, what conferences?

AJAY SHARMA

======Ajay Sharma responds=
I have given you the link along with paper.
I again give the link
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

This paper is published in journal
Physics Essays
www.physicsessays.com
I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.


RED FLAG!

The journal may be new or old , to start with it is all right. Moreover
it is in record in conferences from USA , England and Europe.
It is true.
Now important thing is to see whether the statement

''Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically

analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
special conditions only.
For this we have have to undertand the Einstein's nutty paper ''

is correct.
If it is correct , then it is advancement in science.

Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Its title is
DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
By A. Einstein September 27, 1905
Then one can really draw conclusions from it.

.

Relevant Pages