Re: 100 Years of E=mc2


Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
You asked me where E=mc^2 is wrong, idiot.
> > ----------
> >
>
Sorry Porat, you are not worth the effort. I don't need to use
different names to annoy you, all I have to do is point out that you
were never a physicist and are incapable of even learning simple
English to make you mad.

Gosh, isn't that sad? You pretend to be an authority on all things in
physics yet you have no education to show for it, and your mind is so
porous that even simple things like the spelling of the word "photon"
go right through one ear and out the other.
---------------------------------
disturbed Josef Goebeless

if you realy are just a student than you are the limit a nazi
*** can be
ie the symbol of animal behaviour of a zero scientist
a zero human being with such a big impertinance

now just bring other evidence than your own (disturbed nazi ***)
evidence
that E=mc^2

IS NOT VALID IN A GRAVITATIONALFIELD

Special relativity isn't valid in a gravitational field, you fuckwit.
If you actually had an education in physics you wouldn't have to have
this explained to you.
-----------------------
Hi fuckwit stident of 22 years old

E=mc^2 every where got it imbecil??
do you know waht i sgravity enough to say
it is not valid there little Nazi ***??

no one realy knows what is gravity
so how can you tell that E=mc^2 is not valid there ??
just because youare a litle 22 years Josef Goebeless ??
go make your student homework instead of siting like a bump
parasite mext to the computer all day !!

Y.P
---------------------------


.

Quantcast