Re: Electromagnetic wave and photon spin




It seems to me that the EM field works like this:

1) Particals are energized with a voltage in lets say a wire.
2) The E field causes charges to move (this is the mystery part)
3) The moving charges causes a magnetic filed (this is the mystery
part)
4) The alternating magnetic field causes a propagating Electric field.
5) Far away from the radiator we get an E and M field whose ratio is
375.
6) This 375 represents the impedance of what used to be called the
ether and accounts for zero point energy lost?
7) The M field directly represents current flow. So like ohms law where
e=I*R we have E=M*375 (in free space).

I can now clearly see now why the change in velocity causes the EM
radiation. But what is still unclear is what or how exactly the
magnetic field is generated when a charge has a velocity (constant
current). What exactly about charge movement causes a magnetic field to
form?

Heres one thought. A charged particle forms force lines. Lets say an
electron (-) forms a force line with another Electron (-) which is in
front of the first electron (-) in the direction of travel that our
field voltage will eventually be applied.

By applying the voltage we cause our electrons to move but not the
force lines This would cause the force lines to overlap or buckle in
the middle of the two particles. it will also cause a gap to be formed
behind both particles.

-----\ gap\--------(-)------\overlap\-----\gap\----(-)-------\overlap\
---->

The overlap means that an excess of force exists in that area causing
the force to eminate 90 degrees away from the initial voltage
direction.The other force vectors going out from the charge at
different angles would get thier force vectors overlapped but because
of the angle the overlaps would not be a s big as the force vector
which was traveling in the direction of the voltage. This can explain
why the magnetic field appears to rotate around the wire in a circular
path as the different magnitudes of the overlaps throw out field
vectors with different values for each part of the circular path.

I'm not sure what the gaps would cause.

Anyway does this make sense?

if the force lines also moved with the particles, then we could
continually add velocity to the force lines. Isn't this simply an
extension of Einstein's C is constant at all velocity references? In
other words, if I was carrying a flashlight and started walking a 3
mph, the speed of light does not change to C + 3 mph does it ? The
light once emitted travels at C in both references. Well if you watched
from the side as I ran the light would never change speed , correct?
You wouldn't see me catching up to the beam, what you'd see is an
overlap or shortening of the entire picture in the left right
direction, and a lengthening in the up down direction. Isn't that why
Einstein says that the M field is the relativisitic result of the E
field? He calls this a time dilation I think. More like a length
dilation I think.

Is this correct or way off base?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: experimental verification of electromagnetic mass
    ... a massless chargeless photon move charged particles? ... >of electrons and positrons that form the shell around the positron. ... That is approximately 2/3rds of the lepton charge has gone ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... There I derive interparticle interactions in the 2nd ... (between oppositely charged particles) ... Have you seen any study where trajectories of two charges were ... >>to the physical observable of charge. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... There I derive interparticle interactions in the 2nd ... (between oppositely charged particles) ... Have you seen any study where trajectories of two charges were ... >>to the physical observable of charge. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What if the higgs dont exist....
    ... So the vacuum has to be ordered chaos. ... |> have all the elementary fermions as unique particles. ... | that have the property of charge or electric potential. ... | External to the point is a positive infinity and internal to the point ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: What if the higgs dont exist....
    ... So the vacuum has to be ordered chaos. ... |> have all the elementary fermions as unique particles. ... | that have the property of charge or electric potential. ... | External to the point is a positive infinity and internal to the point ...
    (sci.physics)