Re: Taking ground from MetaPhysics.
- From: "T Wake" <usenet.es7at@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:02:28 +0100
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Sep_25_8keT@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi T_Wake, I discuss physics' frontiers, taking ground from MetaPhysics.
Sadly, despite you saying you didn't have time to read and post much you
still managed to fill this message with your drivel.
Observable or not, much is known a priori. As Einstein liked to say:
A quote from Jeff Relf a mere two messages ago in this very thread:
what's not observable is called " metaphysics ", not, " physics ".
This is not Sci.MetaPhysics.
So, again despite what you claim and what you said to Sergey, you think it
is not a case of physics dealing only with the observable?
You need to keep track of your nonsense. You are becoming self
contradictory.
I suppose that lat post didn't take you long as it was pretty much a cut and
paste of your previous drivel.
.
- References:
- Re: Очевидно,Вы - Usenet
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: Wave-particle duality
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- Usnet too has a currency, but it's not demarcated in dollars or рубли.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Re: Usnet too has a currency, but it's not demarcated in dollars or рубли.
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- This is not Sci.MetaPhysics.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Re: This is not Sci.MetaPhysics.
- From: T Wake
- Taking ground from MetaPhysics.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Re: Очевидно,Вы - Usenet
- Prev by Date: Collapsing planet into black hole
- Next by Date: Proposal for an Improved Scientific Notation
- Previous by thread: Taking ground from MetaPhysics.
- Next by thread: Wave-particle duality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|