Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- From: "rds" <rdschwarz61@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 12:06:32 -0700
Greg Neill wrote:
"rds" <rdschwarz61@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159380485.060142.58450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What causes the protons and electrons to maintain charge. What is the
source of the charge.
Fundamentally, as far as Physics is concerned, there's
no better answer to that than "that's the way we
observe it to be".
We theorize conservation of several properties
like energy, charge, color (quark charge) and
note that it seems to be for all tests performed
to date.
"Charge" is just a label for a property or
concept that we have assigned to make our
description of nature consistent.
The color of a light is blue. Color is a property not a thing. But what
is color. This used to be a similar question. Now we know that color is
related to wavelength (and therefore energy level) of the polarized em
field.Or the space(time) between field polarization peaks.
Just because we call something a property does not mean that property
does not have a source.
We defined an electron as a mass particle. Now we know that electrons
are nothing more than localized contained energy whose radius is in the
gama radiation wavelegth. In order to create an electron, all you need
its equivalent mass energy polarized at the gama radiation wavelength.
Isn't this how Pair Products (electrons and positrons are created form
just gama rays?)
This should give us a hint about charge since electrons are the primary
charge carrier particle.
electrons are just "energized" space vibrating at gama wave
frequencies. Whose effective rotational mass/ spin / momentum
prohibits the escape of radiated energy and instead exhibits what we
call a charge. Its direction and localized spin polarizes space.
A proton consists of a neutron plus a positron (a positron has exactly
the same mass
as an electron, but is positively charged). Neutrons decay into an
electron and a neutrino while protons decay into a positron and a
neutrino. This is true even though the effective mass of the neutron is
greater than the proton.
Mass of proton : 1,6726 x 10^(-27) kg
Mass of neutron: 1,6749 x 10^(-27) kg
Mass of electron: 0,00091x10^(-27) kg
it almost appears that:
neutron = proton + electron or:
neutron = (neutron + positron) + electron = neutron (since the
electron and positron essentially cancel
In any event this still does not describe charge, but it begins the
process I think.
SInce we know that a positron and an electron can cancel each other
(like two huricanes spinning in opposite directions when they colide)
isn't it feasable that charge or space polarization is due to the spin
direction or phase shift of the spins between these particles?
Isn't an electron simply a phase shifted positron? Such that if the
phase shift of the rotation is 180 degrees they cancel upon colliding?
(And I imagine its tough to keep them apart)
And if they have an offset in phase only that is less or more than 180
degrees we get a static field set up.
If we have a frequency offset we might see it see as EM waves and or
quanta rings at the difference frequency and its harmonics.
Any thoughts?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- From: rds
- Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- From: Igor
- Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- From: rds
- Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- From: Greg Neill
- What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- Prev by Date: Re: Why aren't " ninjas from hell " going after your team ?
- Next by Date: Re: Solution to Action at Distance Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- Next by thread: Re: What is the source of charged particle's seemingly limitless charge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|