Re: what's light emiited by protons look like?


"OG" <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4pi3c9FivgejU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:QgxYg.151337$PD.45149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "OG" <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:4pfe4qFip17bU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | <mainargv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | news:1160837969.922489.14360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | >
| > | > Randy Poe wrote:
| > | >>
| > | >> However, your original statement that wiggling charges are
| > | >> the only source of EM radiation is incorrect.
| > | >>
| > | >> - Randy
| > | >
| > | > You don't mean to say there are other EM radiations, not caused by
| > | > accelerated (generic) charges?
| > | > EM radiations by themselves?
| > | >
| > |
| > | Photons emitted as atomic spectra are certainly not due to accelerated
| > | charges.
| >
| > WHAT? Would you care to explain that extraordinary statement?
| > Androcles
|
| Photon emission due to electron transition between atomic quantum energy
| levels is not due to 'acceleration' of the electron charge as per
Maxwell's
| equations.
|
And that's the word of Mighty DOG, is it?

Allow me to add:
Photons emitted as atomic spectra are certainly NOT due to
bright green flying elephants passing my window.
Photons emitted as atomic spectra are certainly NOT due to
the accelerated neuron of Mighty Dumb OG.

What I was asking you, Dumb*** OG, is what photons emitted as
atomic spectra ARE due to? (Not that I expect you to have a fucking clue.)

Androcles


.

Quantcast