Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:09:19 GMT
Tom Potter wrote:
I suggest that "Eric Gisse" shouldn't feel so bad
about being perceived as an "idiot".
Potter makes another error in judgment--Eric studies physics
and often contributes useful information in this newsgroup.
Potter, on the other hand,... well it's all in the posting
records.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: tdp1001
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- References:
- Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: tdp1001
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: tdp1001
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: tdp1001
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- From: Tom Potter
- Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- Next by Date: Re: Question: If mass is constant, explain Brownian motion.
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal to change the name of sci.physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|