Re: time "wave/particles"?

<dgoldsmith_89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1161731433.095850.8490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Androcles wrote:
<dgoldsmith_89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1161721933.276167.13320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Hi! Is there any public precedent for modeling/thinking about the
| "passage" of time in terms of an "exchange" of and/or "interaction"
| with "wave-particles of time"? Thanks!
|
| DG

Yes.

References, please? Also, is it regarded as "crack-pot" physics?


Oh sheesh ma.. can I please have another bowl of word-salad? ;-)

FrediFizzx

Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: time "wave/particles"?
    ... Is there any public precedent for modeling/thinking about the ... | with "wave-particles of time"? ... References, please? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: time "wave/particles"?
    ... Is there any public precedent for modeling/thinking about the ... You want a reference to public precedents for modeling/thinking? ... of a real time wave: ... The Kettering picture is highly crackpot, the time axis should be vertical ...
    (sci.physics)