Thus should Galileo be given credit for doing pioneering work in the field of SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY.




Sorcerer wrote:
"Boris Mohar" <borism_-void-_@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9ehqk2p7chcs14070k3o7knu3k0rpgi7l3@xxxxxxxxxx

| Is it sane to ask was the speed of time in the past same as in the
present?


No, it would not be sane.
The speed of time is one second per second.
The speed of mass is one gram per gram.
The speed of length is one metre per metre.


| Would that account for red shift?

Two theories for red shift exist.
1) Doppler shift, expanding Universe.
2) "Tired" light, steady state universe.

Given that the energy from a point source of light in space
is distributed over the ever-increasing surface of an expanding
sphere, and that light arrives in packets called "photons",
nu = 1/Area * h/E is reduced as a function of distance
because area increases as a function of distance.
In other words, photons get "bigger" the further they travel.
This gif is supposed to represent two electrons in an atom
radiating spherically, and the interference gives rise
to two directional photons.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rephoton.gif

Viewed from either side, no energy is received. This is
the principle of phased-array radar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_array

Expanding universe is really silly.
===========================================
Thus should Galileo be given credit for doing pioneering work in the
field of SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY.
It is the basic question.
See the references below.
Existing reference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
Einstein's references
Title of Einstein's paper ( June 2006) , which is well known as
SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Title of paper
ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES.

Print Reference
Einstein, A. Annalen der Physik, 17 891-921 (1905).
Web. Reference
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
The two postulates are quoted in section

§ 2. On the Relativity of Lengths and Times
The following reflexions are based on the principle of relativity and
on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. These two
principles we define as follows:--
1. The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are
not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or
the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion.

Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates
with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a
stationary or by a moving body.

So whatever I have written is based upon these facts.
Further references
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554

AJAY SHARMA 5TH Nov 2006.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
    ... Look in the FAQ for references. ... "But this result comes into conflict with the principle of relativity ... Weber knew that because his field equations were relativistic. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
    ... Look in the FAQ for references. ... "The Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation of Light ... "But this result comes into conflict with the principle of relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
    ... and I am claiming all the time that I am considering 1905 Relativity. ... and in fact (by the principle of relativity) with respect to ... Einstein is referring here to the Principle of Energy Conservation ... some objection to my historic references, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
    ... field of SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY. ... See the references below. ... on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. ... Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Imagine
    ... insofar as your claims in respect of the velocity addition formula goes dont ... Sorry the MM does not prove *your* interpretation and assertion about ... | Since the special theory of relativity revealed the physical ... The faq is just a collection of references with no links that might take ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)