Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: "Igor" <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Nov 2006 09:50:16 -0800
actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Igor wrote:
actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Igor wrote:
actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Who says you're in a frame
I understand perfectly now. Saying "my friend is at x=5" and then
saying "let u=x-5. My friend is at u=0" is distinct from saying "I am
where my friend is".
That said, maybe someone can help me understand the d'alembert solution
to the schroedinger equation. I did this with u=x+ct, v=x-ct.
Then I got nervous and changed the "c" to a "v".
Now I don't know what the h******ell to think.
But the Schroedinger equation is parabolic, meaning that it's first
order in time and second order in spatial coordinates, so how would
this substitution help there? Frankly, I don't see the advantage.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: actionintegral
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- References:
- Preposterous change of variables
- From: actionintegral
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: Igor
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: actionintegral
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: Igor
- Re: Preposterous change of variables
- From: actionintegral
- Preposterous change of variables
- Prev by Date: Re: entanglement question
- Next by Date: Re: Can Fearless Johnny do this
- Previous by thread: Re: Preposterous change of variables
- Next by thread: Re: Preposterous change of variables
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|