Re: Benford's Law Question
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 9 Nov 2006 11:41:22 GMT
In article <LJ6dnTj4yLGFj8_YnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Robert11 <rgsros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Read 78,254 of them, but not being a mathematician, or a scientist, still
have
trouble in discerning the salient point of "why is it so" ?
Any distribution that represents something in the real world is likely
to have an upper limit. Unless the limit
happens to be a power of ten, there are going to be powers of ten
which occur multiplied by small digits but not large ones.
For example, if the house numbers in a street go up to 45,
there are going to be 1 each of the single digit numbers,
10 each of two-digit numbers starting 1-3, and t starting with
4. If the numbers go up to 150, you can see there will be
far more starting with 1 than any other digit. Add up the
numbers for lots of streets, and the 1s will dominate,
followed by the 2s and so on.
If the distribution has a lower bound, or an interesting shape, it may
disrupt this effect. Consider the distribution of human heights in
feet, or inches. But reduce the unit size to centimetres and surprise!
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Benford's Law Question
- From: OG
- Re: Benford's Law Question
- References:
- Benford's Law Question
- From: Robert11
- Re: Benford's Law Question
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Benford's Law Question
- From: Robert11
- Benford's Law Question
- Prev by Date: creation & copyrights
- Next by Date: Would the winter seas be too rough for a guy like me ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Benford's Law Question
- Next by thread: Re: Benford's Law Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|