Re: Robotic bomb detection devices.
- From: GravityPhysics@xxxxxxxxx (tj Frazir)
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:57:43 -0500
they used the oposit side xray .
They cant focus the reflection well enouph with those alluminm lense .
It takes a screen made of gold shapped as a lense to focus xray
reflections .
yet alluminum is allmost as worthless as gass to gamma.
This bomb detector imager dont use gamma it used a shortwave xray and
a dim one.
A bright one would show a blank page except for a gold ring or chain.
But the brigher one will go threw more silt.
A bright light shines threw you hand and a dim one wount. They dont
want a bright xray lamp .
I dont use a lamp ,,I use gamma.
A raidioactive elements no lamp.
A golden lined led box with 1 hole.
2 mile alumination 100,000 watt would be too big a lamp !
600 feet is 4000 watts would be too hard to maintain for mini deep 2
..
a hot-rock-in-the-box dont nead allot of ***.
just a shutter cylinoid.
drop 600 feet alumination 4000 watt down to 100 feet off the bottom
and its one bright bitch and shines threw deep ***.
Its xray gamma so you dont see its bright unless you looking in the
stereoscope.
Looking in the stereo scope you do see how bright your xray light is.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- The gold-lined led box with a gamma-ray-rock and a hole.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- The gold-lined led box with a gamma-ray-rock and a hole.
- References:
- Robotic bomb detection devices.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Robotic bomb detection devices.
- Prev by Date: Re: consuming cold water burns calories??
- Next by Date: Some Web_TV clients run Win_CE on an Intel box.
- Previous by thread: Robotic bomb detection devices.
- Next by thread: The gold-lined led box with a gamma-ray-rock and a hole.
- Index(es):