Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:07:47 GMT
"Timo A. Nieminen" <timo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.WNT.4.64.0611170535280.716@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, xray4abc wrote:
|
| > jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
| >> xray4abc <lemhenyil@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >>
| >> <snip>
| >>
| >>> That's true.
| >>> Yet, still we did not answered the question.
| >>> If there is no electric field line(s) along the conductor or a
| >>> Lorentz force exerted INSIDE the conductor,
| >>> then how come that the electrons are drifting along the conductor ?
| >>> In order to sharpen the question, I have considered the case of
| >>> a zero resistance conductor.
| >>> In my opinion, it needs a little bit more than a traditional answer!
| >>> LL
| >>
| >> From a circuit analyses viewpoint, the answer is trivial.
| >>
| >> What you are really asking is why and how does current flow in a
conductor.
| >
| > Yes. I have always thought that the electric field created by
| > the power source was "pushing" the electrons.
| > It seems that there is something wrong with this picture of the
| > process.
|
| What makes aircraft fly at a constant velocity? Thrust = drag. What makes
| a spaceship travel at constant velocity? Thrust = drag must still be true,
| but drag = 0, therefore, one can conclude what?
|
| You're specifically considering the case of R=0. Why should any force be
| needed to keep the electrons moving?
|
| From a circuit analysis viewpoint, it really is trivial. From a Maxwell
| viewpoint, it's less trivial. If you want it to be an educational problem,
| figure out how Maxwell gives you the circuit theory picture. Just keep in
| mind that circuit theory general treats wires as R=0, while in Maxwell,
| their conductivity is not infinite.
What limits the beam current in a CRT?
Thust equals drag?
Permittivity?
None of the above?
It really is trivial.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- References:
- Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: jimp
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: jimp
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: jimp
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: xray4abc
- Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- From: Timo A. Nieminen
- Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- Prev by Date: Re: Puddle_Muck didn't put in the effort.
- Next by Date: Re: New piston engine get 30% better efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- Next by thread: Re: Simple electricity, and yet.....!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|