Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Nov 2006 14:42:42 -0800
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1163715802.064371.291010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:Not very well, either.
On 2006-11-16 22:14:43 +0000, "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> said:
So it seems both T Wake and Phineas T Puddleduck cannot count or
perform proper google search results.
But yet we found the correct person and you didn't.
Guy, you really can't think very deep, can you? Hello! You are the
one telling me about Dennis B. I am just pointing out Dennis B's, LOL.
Interesting - we have a poster here who suffers from terminal idiocy.
Never mind mate, I'm sure you could probably live a nearly normal life
with your condition. As long as you don't have to count above five
Your memory is short. It was eight results, not five. Gee, is this the
same Phineas T Puddleduck -->
Famous Quotes from Phineas T Puddleduck,
"As neutrino's do not interact with normal matter"
"Neutrino's interaction with matter is vanishly small."
LOL
Regards,
Paul
Calculated the neutrino's mean-free-path yet? Hint, I hope you
calculator can cope with scientific notation.
Was your school special, by any chance?
Funny thing is, here you are arguing that people are being too rigourous
in their definitions, and here you are doing the same.
LOL, Phineas T Puddleduck practices "close enough" physics.
Famous Quotes from Phineas T Puddleduck,
"As neutrino's do not interact with normal matter"
"Neutrino's interaction with matter is vanishly small."
Phineas T Puddleduck thinks to self, "Eh, close enough."
.
- References:
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: T Wake
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: T Wake
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- From: Paul
- Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- Prev by Date: Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- Next by Date: Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|