Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

In article <1164642252.250273.239670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You should really hang out with other people. One of your cronies is
under the impression he needs a dictionary to spell "particle", and
believes his "incorrect" definition of inductance is close enough.
<<<G>>> During a conversation regarding an "isolated system" another
one of your cronies clearly stated that neutrinos do not interact with
matter. You have made so many errors that I lost track, such as
magnetic moments flipping in zero seconds. Some of your cronies get
off calling people names that you or any human being would punch in the
face if said in person. Fortunately I am beyond such childish acts as
such name-calling merely strengthens my character.


You can point out little errors, but blind to the huge gaping ones of
your own. Keep on shining, you crazy diamond!

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.