sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• resonant frequency questions
  • From: jjoensuu
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mean free path
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Cold fusion review
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Mean free path
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: test
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: OsherD
• Re: test
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mean free path
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Mean free path
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Gareth
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: passive radar theory refrence needed
  • From: Gareth
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: passive radar theory refrence needed
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: boson boss
• happy and prosperous new year 2007 everybody
  • From: himalayahill@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kerr Rotation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
  • From: OsherD
• Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: mike3
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kerr Rotation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kerr Rotation
  • From: manofsan
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa
  • From: Brablo
• Re: jet engine
  • From: jimp
• passive radar theory refrence needed
  • From: Peter Divos
• Re: What is waving, electron wave function?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***
  • From: Squidward Tentacles
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons
  • From: Sorcerer
• What is waving, electron wave function.
  • From: andy everett
• paths of various seismic waves
  • From: nospam
• Re: You have sinned against God
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• What is waving, electron wave function?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: jet engine
  • From: STUARTe
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Sorcerer
• Elements w/ unpaired neutrons
  • From: Mark Waugh
• Re: jet engine
  • From: unsettled
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Greg Neill
• What's New -- Friday, December 29, 2006 Bob Park
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: jet engine
  • From: jimp
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: jet engine
  • From: STUARTe
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: The Æther vortex
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Æther vortex
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Hey Sharon :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Hey Sharon :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!
  • From: hanson
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: malibu
• Re: jet engine
  • From: unsettled
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Teg
• Re: The new Aether
  • From: hanson
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Stan
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Stan
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Stan
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Greg Neill
• jet engine
  • From: STUARTe
• Hey Sharon :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: boson boss
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reason #2 for celebrating at the end of December
  • From: Jong Kim
• A Few Words From India On Telepathy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: hanson
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• self-interaction of general relativity
  • From: Barrow
• Re: REALITY and a model to represent it.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: himalayahill@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• Re: Isobaric Expansion
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa
  • From: John Baez
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: brad
• Re: Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: REALITY and a model to represent it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lagrangian in relativity
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• REALITY and a model to represent it.
  • From: globarr
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lagrangian in relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: boson boss
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• Re: Does absorption in semiconductors results from density of states ?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A look under the hood of a quadrupole magnet
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: malibu
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The new wheel
  • From: hanson
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: brad
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: kenseto
• The new wheel
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas
  • From: OsherD
• For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: cafeinst
• String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: cafeinst
• Unbihexium
  • From: manofsan
• lagrangian in relativity
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• Does absorption in semiconductors results from density of states ?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Edwards
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: jimp
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: unsettled
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***
  • From: hanson
• Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***
  • From: Squidward Tentacles
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***
  • From: Squidward Tentacles
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 807 December 29, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: malibu
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: malibu
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Teg
• Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean
  • From: Tareq
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
  • From: nospam
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Stan
• Higher densities create stronger vacuums.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Mike
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Robin
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• cheap travel deals on indiafaredeals
  • From: nik
• Re: Quick electron flow question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quick electron flow question
  • From: Robin
• Re: Forecasted Nuclei
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Dark Energy Liabilities = Dark Matter Assets ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Dark Energy Liabilities = Dark Matter Assets ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***
  • From: Squidward Tentacles
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: srp
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: questions about Einstein's equation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: parabolic antenna science (was: Many people still believe in the Bible litterally(sic).)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: jimp
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: T Wake
• How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?
  • From: cafeinst
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Teg
• New IRC Channel: #moderncalcs
  • From: RadSurfer
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• questions about Einstein's equation
  • From: Barrow
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Infinity mirror question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Are we our thoughts or is liquid water required ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Talk instead of long emails ?! Made easy with craigsnumber
  • From: easyrider80
• Re: A question about quantum computations
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: himalayahill@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: srp
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Infinity mirror question
  • From: Robin
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Sorcerer
• high current rechargeables
  • From: Scott
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: malibu
• Re: Corey White's Perpetual Motion Machine
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: mmeron
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Jonathan Sturm
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Teg
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Jonathan Sturm
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: mmeron
• Re: A research
  • From: PD
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: hmz6
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: andy everett
• Cosmology Using Gamma-Ray Bursts
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Jonathan Sturm
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: A research
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Jewish Cowboy
• Re: Phineas' ignorance is willful, designed to prop up his massive delusions.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Phineas' ignorance is willful, designed to prop up his massive delusions.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Commendations To George Bush
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: andy everett
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: andy everett
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: kunzmilan
• HEART OF THE UNIVERSE: NEW BOOK ANNONCEMENT
  • From: cosmic yogi
• Phineas' ignorance is willful, designed to prop up his massive delusions.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: Sorcerer
• A question about scientific truth
  • From: Jonathan Sturm
• Re: A question about scientific truth
  • From: mmeron
• Einstein was not technically a " Pantheist " nor an " atheist ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 58.0: The Big Rip
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 58.0: The Big Rip
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Einstein's Pantheism.
  • From: Scott H
• Re: Commendations To George Bush
  • From: Edward Green
• another globular projectile in the wind
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions
  • From: Jonas
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification
  • From: Harvy Resiling
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification
  • From: Harvy Resiling
• A question about quantum computations
  • From: hatemghani
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: To Aether or not to Aether.... ahahahaha....
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: uri
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Merry" this one for Christmas :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Milan
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: hmz6
• "Merry" this one for Christmas :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• To Aether or not to Aether.... ahahahaha....
  • From: hanson
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Spin apart water molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Milan
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Spin apart water molecules
  • From: Martin Winer
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrostatic field
  • From: Meir Achuz
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Amazing 4 Pole Magnet.
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• The Flying Circus of Physics, 2nd--Difference with 1st
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Einstein's Pantheism.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrostatic field
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrostatic field
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A research
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Einstein's Pantheism.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electrostatic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Jim Black
• Electrostatic field
  • From: mohammad . esmaeili
• Electrostatic field
  • From: mohammad . esmaeili
• Why does fire have a shadow??
  • From: hmz6
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Isobaric Expansion
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Isobaric Expansion
  • From: renai
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Isobaric Expansion
  • From: mmeron
• Isobaric Expansion
  • From: renai
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.1: Japan, India, Israel Take Up Greene-Morrison-Strominger Research
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.1: Japan, India, Israel Take Up Greene-Morrison-Strominger Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Einstein's Pantheism.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Einstein's Pantheism.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A research
  • From: unsettled
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A research
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A research
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• A research
  • From: Sourcerer
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems
  • From: hanson
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems
  • From: hanson
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Homos Flaccidus
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: Sue...
• Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem...
  • From: mcholette@xxxxxxx
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?
  • From: srp
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• does positive K-S entropy imply mixing?
  • From: Charlotte
• Re: Merry Christmas ya bunch of loons - !!!!!! : )
  • From: unsettled
• Merry Christmas ya bunch of loons - !!!!!! : )
  • From: huangxienchen
• Barium Titanate powder problems
  • From: Sutor78
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Einstein's " religion " is way too advanced for Wiki_Pedia.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's " religion " is way too advanced for Wiki_Pedia.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Einstein's " religion " is way too advanced for Wiki_Pedia.
  • From: T Wake
• It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Einstein's " religion " is way too advanced for Wiki_Pedia.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions
  • From: ABarlow
• Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics
  • From: ABarlow
• common assumption used for quantum mechanics
  • From: hlseck
• Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: exp(j*pi/2)
• In case Christmas music has... :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: light photon
  • From: George
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Unexamined thermo question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Mainstream Antigravity?
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Mainstream Antigravity?
  • From: The Thing
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.2: Space-Time Reversal in Big Bang To Big Crunch And Doctorow-Penrose Diagram
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Forecasted Nuclei
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Mainstream Antigravity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Mainstream Antigravity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mr Hawkings ! How long 'till darkness do we part?
  • From: mike . j . harvey
• Mainstream Antigravity?
  • From: The Thing
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: light photon
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Pete, you don't really believe it.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Was the cosmos ever _Really_ 100 Mega_Years old ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Unicode rocks ! ASCII is dead. you should check into it.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Dark matter only comes in clumps larger than about 1,000 light-years across ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Teg
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Mr Hawkings ! How long 'till darkness do we part?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Unicode rocks ! ASCII is dead. you should check into it.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?
  • From: mike . j . harvey
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?
  • From: louis
• Was the cosmos ever _Really_ 100 Mega_Years old ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Forecasted Nuclei
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei
  • From: Jim Black
• Unicode rocks ! ASCII is dead. you should check into it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: light photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Dark matter only comes in clumps larger than about 1,000 light-years across ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?
  • From: Sue...
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off"
  • From: OsherD
• Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?
  • From: kguy
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sue...
• Re: light photon
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: light photon
  • From: George
• Re: light photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: light photon
  • From: Mike
• light photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: speed of light
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: speed of light
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: exp(j*pi/2)
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Josephmas, or the real reason to celebrate toward the end of December
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Old Physics books
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: speed of light
  • From: srp
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe
  • From: Karenia Brevis
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei
  • From: malibu
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons...
  • From: jimp
• Introductory Physics Books Suggestions
  • From: Jonas
• Forecasted Nuclei
  • From: vlcek
• Fundamental spheres in nuclei
  • From: vlcek
• Re: At any given " moment " in cosmological time, 4-D spacetime is Cartesian.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv
  • From: louis
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe
  • From: louis
• Re: At any given " moment " in cosmological time, 4-D spacetime is Cartesian.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cosmic Gravitational Deceleration is " where spacetime is. "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cosmic Gravitational Deceleration is " where spacetime is. "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv
  • From: Sorcerer
• At any given " moment " in cosmological time, 4-D spacetime is Cartesian.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: Sorcerer
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Cosmic Gravitational Deceleration is " where spacetime is. "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Old Physics books
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons...
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: light photons and EM waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: jimp
• light photons and EM waves
  • From: panfilero
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: neohunts
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Old Physics books
  • From: David Findlay
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: neohunts
• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space
  • From: jimp
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: jimp
• The best of 2006 from Institute of Physics Publishing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Intelligence Branch of Military in Space
  • From: SnitchedAndTortured
• What's New -- Bob Park -- Friday, December 22, 2006
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Old Physics books
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: neohunts
• High Current Batteries
  • From: Scott
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: jimp
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Relation between elctron movement and power factor
  • From: neohunts
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: hanson
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• speed of light
  • From: panfilero
• Re: The start of Big Bang is entirely virtual, not real.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The start of Big Bang is entirely virtual, not real.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: galathaea
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter
  • From: malibu
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: hanson
• Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who _Is_ more important, Albert Einstien or Jesus ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: temperature
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Over cosmological " time ", 5-D Gravity_Time_Space is hyperbolic.
  • From: T Wake
• Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Over cosmological " time ", 5-D Gravity_Time_Space is hyperbolic.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Over cosmological " time ", 5-D Gravity_Time_Space is hyperbolic.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Over cosmological " time ", 5-D Gravity_Time_Space is hyperbolic.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: malibu
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Teg
• Can Jeff_Relf answer this?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: temperature
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: temperature
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: temperature
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Old Physics books
  • From: David Findlay
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: temperature
  • From: Jim Black
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.1: Probable Influence/Causation (PI) Implies Infinite Velocity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.1: Probable Influence/Causation (PI) Implies Infinite Velocity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: Herman Family
• Re: The_Ghost and Jave EE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Power and rockets
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Ditto
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: grzes
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: grześ
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: grześ
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: OG
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sorcerer
• IV law of thermodynamics
  • From: grześ
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: grześ
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: grzes
• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: temperature
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: grześ
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: hanson
• What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?
  • From: Ditto
• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Inverse 1/x function complex analytic
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota
  • From: TedJob
• Why light makes atoms moving faster?
  • From: grześ
• Re: temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: temperature
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: temperature
  • From: mmeron
• Re: temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: temperature
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: temperature
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: T Wake
• Re: temperature
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Question about Bohm interpretation
  • From: srp
• Re: temperature
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• temperature
  • From: grześ
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: pepe
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: zhangyilei
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Chernobyl Equals Black And White in Russian
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Chernobyl Equals Black And White in Russian
  • From: Edwards
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Salty boling water
  • From: Sorcerer
• Salty boling water
  • From: pepe
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 50.0: Unification and Masers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 50.0: Unification and Masers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 50.0: Unification and Masers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetum mobile competition
  • From: Herman Family
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Question about Bohm interpretation
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: PD
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Question about Bohm interpretation
  • From: Mike
• Water pores reveal age of paper
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: a measurement question
  • From: I am not Einstein
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: PD
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: OG
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: OG
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: *** EXPLOSIVE: FBI coverup of REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILIA in THE WHITE HOUSE *** ENJOY !!!
  • From: Bruce Sinclair
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: RichD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: *** EXPLOSIVE: FBI coverup of REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILIA in THE WHITE HOUSE *** ENJOY !!!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Power and rockets
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: srp
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: asdf
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Perpetum mobile competition
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Interpreting the MMX Null Result
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: SKonen
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 806 December 20, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: SKonen
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Constant Speed of Light
  • From: SKonen
• Re: Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Looking for Books of Interesting Physics Stories.
  • From: Tomislav
• Re: The workings of the Brain must be priority
  • From: GatherNoMoss
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.1: Causal Sets Can Cross Multiverse
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Wikiality
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Wikiality
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " There are guards everywhere. "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Lithium-ion battery pack Switchable 14.4-30AH or 7.2V-60AH
  • From: Scott
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Einstein's Wikiality
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Power and rockets
  • From: dh
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.1: Causal Sets Can Cross Multiverse
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.1: Causal Sets Can Cross Multiverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Jim Black
• Tiny dip could point to cosmic-ray origins
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: fitz
• >-) ~-`-`- Amazing 5.5" Turd Cutter -' -'-~ (-<
  • From: Information
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The next time your car gets stolen... remember this...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: " There are guards everywhere. "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The next time your car gets stolen... remember this...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The next time your car gets stolen... remember this...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: " There are guards everywhere. "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• The next time your car gets stolen... remember this...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: " There are guards everywhere. "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• " There are guards everywhere. "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: zhangyilei
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: RichD
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: zhangyilei
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Fire Barrier Materials, Flame Retardants, Halogen free Flame Retardants in electronics...plastics..
  • From: molecular
• Andy Resnick is dangerous and should not be allowed near anything electrical.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: The spoiled brats that stalk me are their own worse enemies.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What's New - Bob Park
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T_Wake, Do you like getting butt-f_cked by teams of drunk 80 year olds ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: a measurement question
  • From: hanson
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Teg
• Cosmic structure explained without dark matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: What's New - Bob Park
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What's New - Bob Park
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The spoiled brats that stalk me are their own worse enemies.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: T_Wake, Do you like getting butt-f_cked by teams of drunk 80 year olds ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: a measurement question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A blast from the past: the thread Spin and SO(3)
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Sea-level rise could be greater than IPCC predictions
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• The spoiled brats that stalk me are their own worse enemies.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: T_Wake, Do you like getting butt-f_cked by teams of drunk 80 year olds ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What's New - Bob Park
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• The_Ghost and Jave EE.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.0: Causal Sets & Unimodular Relativity (Alternative to GR)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a measurement question
  • From: I am not Einstein
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.0: Causal Sets & Unimodular Relativity (Alternative to GR)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: Brit
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's New - Bob Park
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.0: Causal Sets & Unimodular Relativity (Alternative to GR)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 49.0: Causal Sets & Unimodular Relativity (Alternative to GR)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: a measurement question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: unsettled
• a measurement question
  • From: I am not Einstein
• Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sorcerer
• What's New - Bob Park
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Colin
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: questions about the Christoffel symbol
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 48.0: Causation and Disproof of Von Neumann Uniqueness
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Seeking the advice of other people
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• electron diffraction by a micron particle
  • From: zhangyilei
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Colin
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Colin
• Re: questions about the Christoffel symbol
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: briggs
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How to calculate coefficient of kinetic friction?
  • From: faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.1: PI Role in Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: photon's wavefunction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• questions about the Christoffel symbol
  • From: GRseminar
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: briggs
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The richer society gets the more spoiled its brats.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: photon's wavefunction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sue...
• The richer society gets the more spoiled its brats.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 18, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: photon's wavefunction
  • From: kvblake
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: Jay Sulzberger
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.1: PI Role in Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 48.0: Causation and Disproof of Von Neumann Uniqueness
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 48.0: Causation and Disproof of Von Neumann Uniqueness
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 48.0: Causation and Disproof of Von Neumann Uniqueness
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.1: PI Role in Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• The history of Moment of Inertia
  • From: Ditto
• Addenda to 'novel Klein-Gordon form for gravitational red shift' post
  • From: stargene
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Kovalevskaya/kovalevsky top
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Kovalevskaya/kovalevsky top
  • From: JJ
• On the Observations of Ice Melting In a Plastic Cup
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.4: Gravitational Optics, Gravitational Birefringence, Anti-CFD/AdS
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: "THEORY OF EVERYTHING."
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Which way do you turn the twistie?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.1: PI Role in Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Which way do you turn the twistie?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A game called, " Who wants to die owing a million dollars ? "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: Edward Green
• A game called, " Who wants to die owing a million dollars ? "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why does light travel so slowly?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Which way do you turn the twistie?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Damn, my diaper battery is dead !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Colin
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Colin
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Trying to understand AC by analogy to water waves.
  • From: Colin
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: CWatters
• Re: brains in natural phenomena ?
  • From: Greg
• Re: Simple PDE question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: If I worked for MicroSoft...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: hanson
• A (simple) question on the conservation of momentum
  • From: Tareq
• Re: If I worked for MicroSoft...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: If I worked for MicroSoft...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: hanson
• Simple PDE question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Florescent light bulbs?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Centrifugal force acting on runners in circular lane.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: If I worked for MicroSoft...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Florescent light bulbs?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Centrifugal force acting on runners in circular lane.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why does light travel so slowly?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If I worked for MicroSoft...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: unsettled
• Can't say I didn't warn you :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Merry Newtonmas
  • From: Michael E.Marotta
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: maxwell-boltzmann
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.4: Gravitational Optics, Gravitational Birefringence, Anti-CFD/AdS
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: efficiency of regenerative braking?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 47.0: Light Generates Matter by d(c)/dt = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: No need for human physicist any more?
  • From: 281979
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Goto's labels makes code _Tons_ more readable ( and lest nested ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Classic Cases: Crackpot Cardinale Confuses Celeritas, Celery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Centrifugal force acting on runners in circular lane.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: False Vacuum Power Up
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: hanson
• Re: No need for human physicist any more?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Neat motor
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Warnings!
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: False Vacuum Power Up
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Warnings!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Warnings!
  • From: Dr. Pastor
• Re: Trashing legacy code is usually the best way to go.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: temperature gradient for solar system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Trashing legacy code is usually the best way to go.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Trashing legacy code is usually the best way to go.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Centrifugal force acting on runners in circular lane.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: False Vacuum Power Up
  • From: Sue...
• USA's intellectual might, on Carter :-)
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• False Vacuum Power Up
  • From: forex10
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.4: Gravitational Optics, Gravitational Birefringence, Anti-CFD/AdS
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: No need for human physicist any more?
  • From: The Thing
• No need for human physicist any more?
  • From: paulwvanc
• temperature gradient for solar system
  • From: paulwvanc
• Re: Killfile = Insecurity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: maxwell-boltzmann
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: maxwell-boltzmann
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Converting .XLS files to other formats.
  • From: T Wake
• Converting .XLS files to other formats.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: XML is not Excel's native format ( yet ).
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.4: Gravitational Optics, Gravitational Birefringence, Anti-CFD/AdS
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.4: Gravitational Optics, Gravitational Birefringence, Anti-CFD/AdS
  • From: OsherD
• Do Physics Majors ever write their own programs
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• XML is not Excel's native format ( yet ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: PD
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: doc
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: doc
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Outlook for " Computer Programmers " ( like me, I write games ).
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Prisoner at War
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: canonical transformations
  • From: Igor
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: briggs
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: briggs
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• problems with FT-IR
  • From: Ludo
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Request for Discussion
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Request for Discussion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Andros' Rephoton (2)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question
  • From: PD
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: PD
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Collision between point masses in two dimensions: 4 parameters and 3 equations !
  • From: Tareq
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Y.Porat
• canonical transformations
  • From: Robert Mintram
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: Boniq
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 December 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore will not say if he's illegal alian or not.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 December 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The Outlook for " Computer Programmers " ( like me, I write games ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: malibu
• Sea-level rise could be greater than IPCC predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• please help, im desperate:(...
  • From: Alergoman
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Just a reminder about the reality of centrifugal force
  • From: PD
• Trashing legacy code is usually the best way to go.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Fund one penny for this movie, and we shall have a new direction, a new course
  • From: gb7648
• Re: Jackson Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I'm not stalking anyone, constantly telling them to leave.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore will not say if he's illegal alian or not.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• MathFreak_NoMore will not say if he's illegal alian or not.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: operator jay
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: Gordon
• Jackson Question
  • From: Jason Pawloski
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: T_Wake, Go ahead... Do it.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: jimp
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: photon's wavefunction
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: malibu
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: Boniq
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: CWatters
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: Boniq
• Re: Melting ice with laser
  • From: PD
• Re: E/H in a waveguide
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: E/H in a waveguide
  • From: DmitryKovtun
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Tareq
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: kunzmilan
• photon's wavefunction
  • From: kvblake
• Melting ice with laser
  • From: Boniq
• Re: E/H in a waveguide
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Link between the 1st law of Thermodynamics and the Newtonian theorem of kinetic energy
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• E/H in a waveguide
  • From: Apterix80
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.3: Why Canada's Perimeter Institute Can't Keep Up With the Princeton Institute
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.3: Why Canada's Perimeter Institute Can't Keep Up With the Princeton Institute
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.3: Why Canada's Perimeter Institute Can't Keep Up With the Princeton Institute
  • From: OsherD
• Question Galactic Supernova
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: Morpheal
• Creating monoenergetic electron beams on a tabletop
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.2: Nathan Rosen Originates Bimetric Theory, and Origin of Gravitational Optics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pedophilia Supported by Famous Mathmetician
  • From: Laura Sanchez
• Re: Recursive Archery Bow ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• T_Wake, Go ahead... Do it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Recursive Archery Bow ?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Properties in Kusadasi Turkey
  • From: kusadasimodaemlak
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: NotMyRealName
• F.A.Q !!!! TURKEY Kusadasi Moda Real Estate Construction !!!!
  • From: kusadasimodaemlak
• Re: Discreteness is always virtual, never real.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Recursive Archery Bow ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Most ( ¿ 99 percent ) file formats don't employ DTD files.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lighting stars effect
  • From: Gordon
• Re: False Vacuum Information
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: CWatters
• False Vacuum Information
  • From: forex10
• Re: Newton's rings.
  • From: dessex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Discreteness is always virtual, never real.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 805 December 13, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newton's rings.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Lighting stars effect
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: George
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Test
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Test
  • From: William Hightower
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: PD
• Re: Just a reminder about the reality of centrifugal force
  • From: PD
• Re: Lighting stars effect
  • From: John Bailey
• Pedophilia Supported by Famous Mathmetician
  • From: Laura Sanchez
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Sue...
• Discreteness is always virtual, never real.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Tareq
• Lighting stars effect
  • From: kris . kashtanova
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.1: Astrophysics Answer To How Do We Use arXiv and Front Now?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.1: Astrophysics Answer To How Do We Use arXiv and Front Now?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.1: Astrophysics Answer To How Do We Use arXiv and Front Now?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Most ( ¿ 99 percent ) file formats don't employ DTD files.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: OG
• Re: electrorheological fluid
  • From: Sorcerer
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 December 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: John
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: tadchem
• electrorheological fluid
  • From: heiko ackermann
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Radio Lab
  • From: Dan Bloomquist
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: jimp
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Magnetism whats happening
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: jimp
• Symmetry of carbon nanotubes
  • From: Eb . Najafi
• Re: Magnetism whats happening
  • From: Jim Black
• The recoil of a hose when the tap is suddenly opened
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Magnetism whats happening
  • From: Richard
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Where is a DTD file repository?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Physics Christmas Carols
  • From: moosemcwilliams
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Sue...
• Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Pygmalion
• Re: How to split (or combine) magnetic force?
  • From: vktamhane12
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Sue...
• What is the cause of motion?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: PD
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Just a reminder about the reality of centrifugal force
  • From: PD
• Re: Just a reminder about the reality of centrifugal force
  • From: PD
• Re: Just a reminder about the reality of centrifugal force
  • From: PD
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: John
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: vortices
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: vortices
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: vortices
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: vortices
  • From: malibu
• Re: Link between the 1st law of Thermodynamics and the Newtonian theorem of kinetic energy
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: I'm not so sure T.J. is coming back.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: vortices
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: vortices
  • From: malibu
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Interpreting discrete Fourier transform.
  • From: Jean
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner? "Aurora Borealis"
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner? "Aurora Borealis"
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner? "Aurora Borealis"
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: vortices
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Christmas time is here
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Randy Poe
• New interpretation of quantum mechanics based on cell-structured space
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Laser system zaps missile into mincemeat
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Link between the 1st law of Thermodynamics and the Newtonian theorem of kinetic energy
  • From: Pierre
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where is a DTD file repository?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Christmas time is here
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Teg
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What Is The Best Design for velocity sensor ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: Ben Newsam
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 11, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: I'm not so sure T.J. is coming back.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Magic mirror
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.0: How Do We Use arXiv and Front Now?
  • From: John
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.0: How Do We Use arXiv and Front Now?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: vortices
  • From: malibu
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.2: Hyperboloid vs Double Cone in PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.2: Hyperboloid vs Double Cone in PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Magic mirror
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.1: How Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: The Thing
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.1: How Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Eli Luong
• Re: Magic mirror
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Magic mirror
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Freshman in high school here.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• I'm not so sure T.J. is coming back.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Freshman in high school here.
  • From: terabyter
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Religious_Types are afraid of death ( and life ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: hans . dunkell
• Re: Gravitation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Sue...
• Gravitation
  • From: hans . dunkell
• Re: Newton's rings.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: vortices
  • From: Sorcerer
• MathFreak_NoMore, Are you an illegal alian from Iran ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: vortices
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: vortices
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Greg Hansen
• vortices
  • From: wilenchik
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: John
• Re: Newton's rings.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Newton's rings.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Newton's rings.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Eli Luong
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: francoisbelfort
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ghost, what makes you think I'm equally confused ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Huygens' principle is not valid in two dimensions, but all graphs are ...
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 44.0: CFT, AdS/CFT, Braneworlds Are Wrong
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 44.0: CFT, AdS/CFT, Braneworlds Are Wrong
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 44.0: CFT, AdS/CFT, Braneworlds Are Wrong
  • From: OsherD
• Re: God's IQ
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: John
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Ghost, what makes you think I'm equally confused ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Meta_Microscopically, the velocity of light is random, unknown.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Meta_Microscopically, the velocity of light is random, unknown.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Meta_Microscopically, the velocity of light is random, unknown.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Boltzmann's law in The Bound Information Theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: maxwell-boltzmann
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Inductance of an object (metal)
  • From: Eli Luong
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Boltzmann's law in The Bound Information Theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: maxwell-boltzmann
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Who in the Hell is Ed Conrad, and why should anyone care
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: wavetrain
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• wavetrain
  • From: malibu
• Boltzmann's law in The Bound Information Theory
  • From: Mpilot
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Bush
  • From: ActionLyme
• Re: Cosmic conundrum (from a comedian)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cosmic conundrum (from a comedian)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Cosmic conundrum (from a comedian)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Cosmic conundrum (from a comedian)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: The Thing
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike H
• Cosmic conundrum (from a comedian)
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Paul
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• zzzzzzz
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Geometric derivation of Rydberg's constant
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: vktamhane12
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: francoisbelfort
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Ghost, Who's using your code ? to do what ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: The Thing
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Physicists have created a new form of electron microscopy that can make "movies" of atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Physicists peer into ultrashort laser pulses (Dec 8)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who in the Hell is Ed Conrad, and why should anyone care
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Who in the Hell is Ed Conrad, and why should anyone care
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Bell or not, here we come...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Bob Park's What's New -- Friday, December 8, 2006
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Charlie
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Who's kids are more likely to be neglected ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A priori information.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike H
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Charlie
• Re: should we REALLY turn pc's off at night? I don't think so.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Charlie
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Anti-catalytic burner?
  • From: Sean Brisson
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ever nasty people are, quite simply, deluded.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Vlad
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The ponderable ether is static, immutable, space plus spatial time.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A priori information.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: jimp
• Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: john . spevacek
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike H
• How we know the laws of nature are real
  • From: Mike H
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two-photon absorption
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Two-photon absorption
  • From: Michael Nock
• Entropy reducing nanomachines: Feynman's ratchet fixed
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sorcerer
• The ponderable ether is static, immutable, space plus spatial time.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Tin Can and Pressure?
  • From: Vlad
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Bell Tests and Biased Samples
  • From: Edward Green
• Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Charlie
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Charlie
• Re: A priori information.
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A priori information.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Ever nasty people are, quite simply, deluded.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Re: New form for GR's gravitational red shift & a novel interpretation of the underlying physics
  • From: Sue...
• A priori information.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Stipe G.
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: The Thing
• New form for GR's gravitational red shift & a novel interpretation of the underlying physics
  • From: stargene
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: Jada
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Could I turn into a frog
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why not wear clothes with detailed patterns on tv?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Could I turn into a frog
  • From: Zekk Vel Aath
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Parabolas for Blind Poe.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Physical System as Finite, Discrete-State Machine?
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Antennas 101 for Androcles
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: OG
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: OG
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: about that water on Mars...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• about that water on Mars...
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Not only does the ether " have no wind ", it's immutable, static.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How to split (or combine) magnetic force?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Gisse's posting history says it all.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Life without liquid water, when the earth dries like Mars did.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Not only does the ether " have no wind ", it's immutable, static.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Sorcerer
• How is pressure transferred in all directions by a fluid?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Stipe G.
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Not only does the ether " have no wind ", it's immutable, static.
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: greysky
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Mike
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Mechanics/Equipment Resolution Problems
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: elastic collition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Stipe G.
• elastic collition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Stipe G.
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Gisse's posting history says it all.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's posting history says it all.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: Stipe G.
• Re: SETI listens for what?
  • From: Sorcerer
• reinvention of the wheel
  • From: pareshkumar
• Gisse's posting history says it all.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Life without liquid water, when the earth dries like Mars did.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Not only does the ether " have no wind ", it's immutable, static.
  • From: T Wake
• Life without liquid water, when the earth dries like Mars did.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Mr. Crank's check bounced.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Not only does the ether " have no wind ", it's immutable, static.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• SETI listens for what?
  • From: Stipe G.
• Re: Mr. Crank's check bounced.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: jpieterse
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: gyroscope
  • From: fitz
• Re: IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Mr. Crank's check bounced.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Any easy sources (proton, etc) to make low-yield radioactive isotopes?
  • From: rander3127
• The web of life in Earth's oceans may rest on a more delicate balance...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• IR missile charaecteristics
  • From: Adam Chapman
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to split (or combine) magnetic force?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I'd never boast that I failed to understand someone... never.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: gyroscope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A FORCE OF GRAVITY DOES NOT EXIST
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: gyroscope
  • From: Gordon
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• " There is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I'd never boast that I failed to understand someone... never.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• I'd never boast that I failed to understand someone... never.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• gyroscope
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: OG
• Re: Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ".
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How to split (or combine) magnetic force?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• How to split (or combine) magnetic force?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: OG
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Physicists in the US have created a highly-stable optical clock
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity is a _Complex_ 4-D field where time is spatial, immutable.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Liquid Water flowed in the last seven years -- on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Liquid Water flowed in the last seven years -- on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Liquid Water flowed in the last seven years -- on Mars
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Liquid Water flowed in the last seven years -- on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Liquid Water flowed in the last seven years -- on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Igor
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: May this coming year be your best ever.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relative speedd
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Quantum Mechanics/Equipment Resolution Problems
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Electrons are the insides of protons.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quantum Mechanics/Equipment Resolution Problems
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Aluminum ingots as batteries.
  • From: Eeyore
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: T Wake
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: DC
• Re: May this coming year be your best ever.
  • From: Cranks Reply
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Geological features, the earth's spin and Potter's " Galileo Effect ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Richard Herring
• On Physics and Philisophy
  • From: Mpilot
• how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Alan Dillard
• Re: Radio Waves??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Ghost, Who's using your code ? to do what ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Mormons don't believe that 173-year-old people walk the Earth, what do they make of this?
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Source code follies.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Thermal radiation equations
  • From: eriwik
• Quantum Mechanics/Equipment Resolution Problems
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: Visual_Studio doesn't have m4's capabilities.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Thermal radiation equations
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Quantum Eraser Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Quantum Eraser Question
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Quantum Eraser Question
  • From: The Thing
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Eraser Question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: matt271829-news
• Female pedophiles want to birth a baby... not have an orgasm.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: I like the natural look.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I like the natural look.
  • From: Helen
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 804 December 5, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The " ether " is not mutable... Very unintuitive, confusing.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The immutable ether.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J.'s secret to making lots of money.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Transition-edge sensors
  • From: pford
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mmeron
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• SHM; MASS SPRING, Velocity, Energy, Resistor,Damping
  • From: DarkStar
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: OG
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: gerald . monroe
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: T_Wake has no comment on Abramovich and T.J... Shock !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Patrick Michael Foster, " Irish Patty ", Patinha's fiancé.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Most women don't " orgasm ", certainly not like men.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What was the " con " ? drugs ? money ? sex ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I'm just talking to myself.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Igor
• Re: variable motions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relative speedd
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: Igor
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Most women don't " orgasm ", certainly not like men.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Igor
• Re: Anyone here betting on free energy?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: variable motions
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: hanson
• Re: variable motions
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: unsettled
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Most women don't " orgasm ", certainly not like men.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T_Wake has no comment on Abramovich and T.J... Shock !
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The immutable ether.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Most women don't " orgasm ", certainly not like men.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: You can't get humor like this on TV.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I'm just talking to myself.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Mental issues.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Aluminum ingots as batteries.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What are the relaxation oscillations?
  • From: Richard Herring
• T.J.'s secret to making lots of money.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: gerald . monroe
• Re: PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: variable motions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What was the " con " ? drugs ? money ? sex ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Most women don't " orgasm ", certainly not like men.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• T_Wake has no comment on Abramovich and T.J... Shock !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: vlcek
• Re: What was Abramovich's response ? or could you not ask him ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: You can't get humor like this on TV.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: variable motions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I can't afford homeless friends right now.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I'm just talking to myself.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: Tom Potter
• variable motions
  • From: Diana
• Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting.
  • From: Tom Potter
• PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Ben Newsam
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Randy Poe
• The higher the angular velocity the more horizontal its path.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relative speedd
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• The immutable ether.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• The " ether " is not mutable... Very unintuitive, confusing.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: gerald . USENET . monroe
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relative speedd
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Relative speedd
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Relative speedd
  • From: Sampath
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• May this coming year be your best ever.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: gerald . USENET . monroe
• Re: Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Interstellar drive based on continuous stream of projectiles from source system : better than any sail system?
  • From: gerald . USENET . monroe
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• What was Abramovich's response ? or could you not ask him ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Aluminum ingots as batteries.
  • From: Peter Jason
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What holds it up?
  • From: jimp
• You can't get humor like this on TV.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: The Thing
• I'm just talking to myself.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Patrick Michael Foster, " Irish Patty ", Patinha's fiancé.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Mormons don't believe that 173-year-old people walk the Earth, what do they make of this?
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Anisotrophy --- the process in Jong Kim's head. --- The Real "Work of Art"
  • From: Jong Kim
• What holds it up?
  • From: RichD
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: jimp
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Edward Green
• Einstein was most definately a founding father of Quantum Mechanics.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Lost tribes vs. Einstein and Gravity Probe B.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Charlie
• I can't afford homeless friends right now.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Drew
• Mental issues.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Measurement of pitch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.3: An Infinite Sequence of Logarithmic Paradoxes
  • From: OsherD
• Measurement of pitch
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: There's something about qm...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: The Thing
• Re: My criminal record is as blank as Gisse's mind.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: My criminal record is as blank as Gisse's mind.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: My criminal record is as blank as Gisse's mind.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: My criminal record is as blank as Gisse's mind.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• My criminal record is as blank as Gisse's mind.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• There's something about qm...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Anyone here betting on free energy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Volumes Phineas will never fathom.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Cute girls fake orgasms to keep their men and to end the session.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 3 KINDS OF SPEEDS : OBJECTIVE SPEED is the ONLY SPEED.3 SORTES DE VITESSES : LA VITESSE OBJECTIVE est la SEULE VITESSE.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Igor
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: 110 year cold weather record set to fall in Calgary Canada
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Anyone here betting on free energy?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Igor
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Igor
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Igor
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: hanson
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: My bad.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Volumes Phineas will never fathom.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Space Travel Info
  • From: Tenk
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: No information traveled anywhere... The spin just becomes known, a priori.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: THE WAVEFUNCTION OF THE UNIVERSE, AND MANY WORLDS THEORY.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mmeron
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting.
  • From: hanson
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question (edited)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: I spent 800 U.S. dollars just so Patinha could have Wimpels the puppy.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Netscape on Win_98 vs. Web_TV on Win_CE on Global_Star.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I've learned to give T.J. the benefit of the doubt.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Privacy is more important to T.J. ( and Abramovich ) than you can imagine.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Rich people code for the hell of it.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: PD
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: PD
• Re: If Mormons don't believe that 173-year-old people walk the Earth, what do they make of this?
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Volumes Phineas will never fathom.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I'm not " about to become homeless ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: For fear of hights...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I was willing to go homeless... but not really wanting that outcome.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. cares about _Things_, I care about _People_.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: My bad.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Phineas, Find a cute girl...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Most women don't like getting head.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A sticky problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A sticky problem
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: What are the relaxation oscillations?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: unsettled
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: tadchem
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 04, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Gravity Probe A.
  • From: Double-A
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Sitting around the fire and chatting.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Gravity Probe A.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• #2 Relf: Go help tj. He said: "Callffffff calllffff , Im sick..." ..
  • From: hanson
• My bad.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Volumes Phineas will never fathom.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• For fear of hights...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Thermal radiation equations
  • From: eriwik
• If I wanted to learn about T.J. ( or orgasms )...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.2: The Trouble With Axiomatization of Information/Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: tdp1001
• Money isn't eveything... In fact, it counts for very little in my book.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T.J.'s not here... Why worry about it ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Phineas, Find a cute girl...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Visual_Studio doesn't have m4's capabilities.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Relf: Go help tj. He said: "Callffffff calllffff , Im sick..."
  • From: hanson
• Re: T.J.'s not here... Why worry about it ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• T.J.'s not here... Why worry about it ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Phineas, Find a cute girl...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.2: The Trouble With Axiomatization of Information/Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Women lie their asses off when it comes to orgasms.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: The Thing
• Visual_Studio doesn't have m4's capabilities.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.2: The Trouble With Axiomatization of Information/Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.2: The Trouble With Axiomatization of Information/Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Herman Family
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter, How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Origin of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Women faking orgasm to end the session.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Origin of the Universe
  • From: Double-A
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Most women don't like getting head.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: C# and Java's lack of macros has doomed them to the lower classes.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• PHYSICS!? Near God, eh? You have to be old, bald, fat... (bioterrorism)
  • From: syntotic
• "Rellffffff rellffffff, I love to show my yellow teeth!"
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.1: Derivative of log(x), Namely 1/x is the Most Anti-Causal Function
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: jimp
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: OG
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: If I may...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: If I may...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Most women don't like getting head.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Most women don't like getting head.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Origin of the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF VARIABILITY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: C# and Java's lack of macros has doomed them to the lower classes.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I always considered Fearless_Johnny to be a deal, not a certainty.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• C# and Java's lack of macros has doomed them to the lower classes.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: If I may...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 7 knots is 8 MPH... just add one seventh more.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Edward Green
• I always considered Fearless_Johnny to be a deal, not a certainty.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• T.J. dumped the deal because I was objecting to his requirements.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: If I may...
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: jimp
• Re: If I may...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If I may...
  • From: jimp
• Fooling radiocarbon dating
  • From: Jack Linden
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: If I may...
  • From: mike3
• Re: If I may...
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If I may...
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If I may...
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If I may...
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.0: Taylor/MacLaurin Series vs Exponential Series
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: If I may...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• If I may...
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.0: Taylor/MacLaurin Series vs Exponential Series
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Leibniz vs Newton
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 1 Dec 06 Washington, DC
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: francoisbelfort
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: francoisbelfort
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.0: Taylor/MacLaurin Series vs Exponential Series
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 7 knots is 8 MPH... just add one seventh more.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 7 knots is 8 MPH... just add one seventh more.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: Uncle Al
• The quantum mechanical spin of a large stone
  • From: francoisbelfort
• Re: Hanson, Tell us about how you lost your Jaw/Teeth.
  • From: hanson
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Plugging cryostat designed for 50Hz into 60Hz but same voltage
  • From: Simon
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: The Thing
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No information traveled anywhere... The spin just becomes known, a priori.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Need for help!
  • From: ckhou1
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Fallingeagle
• "Shadow" burned into a wall
  • From: mike3
• No information traveled anywhere... The spin just becomes known, a priori.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Potter, How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I think T.J.'s pissed at me.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Einstein asserted that nothing is truly random.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T.J. cares about _Things_, I care about _People_.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rich people code for the hell of it.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sue...
• Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Kev
• Re: I'm not " about to become homeless ".
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Rich people code for the hell of it.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I'm not " about to become homeless ".
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Rich people code for the hell of it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• I'm not " about to become homeless ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: 7 knots is 8 MPH... just add one seventh more.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• 7 knots is 8 MPH... just add one seventh more.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Ghost is more idiot than savant.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I was willing to go homeless... but not really wanting that outcome.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• I was willing to go homeless... but not really wanting that outcome.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 42.0: Exponentials in Cold Dark Matter Halos
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 42.0: Exponentials in Cold Dark Matter Halos
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Ghost is more idiot than savant.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• The Ghost is more idiot than savant.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Second Order Lorentz Transformations in 2 Spatial Dimensions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Second Order Lorentz Transformations in 2 Spatial Dimensions
  • From: symphony
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Hellish landlords.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J.'s mystery ship.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Hellish landlords.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Kev
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.1: Scalar Einstein Equation in Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J.'s mystery ship.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: T.J. cares about _Things_, I care about _People_.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• T.J. cares about _Things_, I care about _People_.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T.J.'s mystery ship.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.1: Scalar Einstein Equation in Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: OsherD
• T.J.'s mystery ship.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: hanson
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Igor
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.1: Scalar Einstein Equation in Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: hanson
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.0: Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: Doug
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Doug
• Height rise of water vapour
  • From: Darth Sinistro
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Deep_II, Rod_Down and the Whale_Rotor.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Netscape on Win_98 vs. Web_TV on Win_CE on Global_Star.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A 90 inch HDTV with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels of resolution..
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I've learned to give T.J. the benefit of the doubt.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 1 December 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A sticky problem
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: A sticky problem
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: No Fusion Today, No Fusion Tomorrow
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: bz
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Edward Green
• Q:nonlocality?
  • From: Alergoman
• Re: Will Tom Potter .... Re: Will Bill Gates board Fearless ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physics Frontier Goes Euro
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Tom Potter
• Physics Frontier Goes Euro
  • From: NG2000
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: Rusty Sites
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: jimp
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.0: Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Kev
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.0: Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Hanson, Tell us about how you lost your Jaw/Teeth.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Questions about the Holocaust
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 40.0: SR Implications of Curvature As Additive PI (Causation)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Doug
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: hanson
• Netscape on Win_98 vs. Web_TV on Win_CE on Global_Star.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Thermal radiation equations
  • From: Doug
• Re: A 90 inch HDTV with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels of resolution..
  • From: satansgoats
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Doug
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 40.2: Relationships With QCD
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• A 90 inch HDTV with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels of resolution..
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Privacy is more important to T.J. ( and Abramovich ) than you can imagine.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• I've learned to give T.J. the benefit of the doubt.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: I spent 800 U.S. dollars just so Patinha could have Wimpels the puppy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 1 Dec 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: hanson
• Deep_II, Rod_Down and the Whale_Rotor.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• A sticky problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Astronomical source of very high-energy gamma-ray pulses has been discovered
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I spent 800 U.S. dollars just so Patinha could have Wimpels the puppy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• I spent 800 U.S. dollars just so Patinha could have Wimpels the puppy.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Money, kids and taxes.
  • From: satansgoats
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: Eric Gisse
• What's the difference between the Gravitational mass and the mass in Newton's First Law
  • From: kmyzzmy
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Kev
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Will Tom Potter .... Re: Will Bill Gates board Fearless ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: smuggie
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: smuggie
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: smuggie
• Re: Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Ask, " Do you know someone who keeps a collection of recovered ship wrecks ? "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: angular momentum,
  • From: Sorcerer
• angular momentum,
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: MathFreak NoMore
• Re: Nuking a lightbulb
  • From: smuggie
• Re: Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: RichD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 40.0: SR Implications of Curvature As Additive PI (Causation)
  • From: smuggie
• Voltage vs. Amperage
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Nuking a lightbulb
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: malibu
• Postdoc in surface characterization at Old Dominion University
  • From: TedJob
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: malibu
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Kev
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Nuking a lightbulb
  • From: mike3
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Igor
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: The trouble with physics
  • From: milwaukeeblues
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: malibu
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Kev
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Isn't the estimated duration of Cosmological Time merely virtual ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Isn't the estimated duration of Cosmological Time merely virtual ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Questions Regarding Quantum Physics & Stenger
  • From: Kev
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Edward Green
• Thermal radiation equations
  • From: eriwik
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Money, kids and taxes.
  • From: T Wake
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Ebyam
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Isn't the estimated duration of Cosmological Time merely virtual ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: bz
• Electrostatics question(s)
  • From: MDL
• Wind Energy Book
  • From: wind energy
• Money, kids and taxes.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Oil is the yardstick.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• The last thing this world needs is more neglected kids.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: spin again
  • From: Jim Heckman
• What all is made from?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Efficiency of a nuclear reactor
  • From: dezakin
• Re: The relation between refractive index and dielectric constant ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Isn't the Chinese Yuan still pegged to the U.S. dollar ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• It's not Bush, it's just the way the world is.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Will Tom Potter .... Re: Will Bill Gates board Fearless ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• How do you protect your assets from the divorce tax ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The relation between refractive index and dielectric constant ?
  • From: The Thing
• Isn't the Chinese Yuan still pegged to the U.S. dollar ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Jeff f_cks up again.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Spinning Star Problem
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spinning Star Problem
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Isn't the estimated duration of Cosmological Time merely virtual ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Efficiency of a nuclear reactor
  • From: smuggie
• Re: Efficiency of a nuclear reactor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Spinning Star Problem
  • From: hanson
• Isn't the estimated duration of Cosmological Time merely virtual ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Crazy people do crazy things
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: Edward Green
• The Pendulum Swings yet again....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Pendulum swings
  • From: mmeron
• The Pendulum Swings
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Spinning Star Problem
  • From: Greg Neill
• The Pendulum swings
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: malibu
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Crazy people do crazy things
  • From: Sorcerer
• Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 40.0: SR Implications of Curvature As Additive PI (Causation)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: sircular motion
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: sircular motion
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Efficiency of a nuclear reactor
  • From: greyham
• Re: sircular motion
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Crazy people do crazy things
  • From: hanson
• Will Tom Potter .... Re: Will Bill Gates board Fearless ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Spinning Star Problem
  • From: hanson
• Re: No one has control of everything.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: tadchem
• sircular motion
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: No one has control of everything.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• No one has control of everything.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I'm up shit creek if T.J. doesn't come back soon.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: jimp
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: unit conversion calculator
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Paul
• Re: Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: unit conversion calculator
  • From: Greg Neill
• Q: unit conversion calculator
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: curve of bent wood?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Ebyam
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Ebyam
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring
• New Trends in Physics
  • From: vlcek
• Re: curve of bent wood?
  • From: andy everett
• Vlcek - EINSTEIN comparison
  • From: vlcek
• Re: X.CPP is the best code in the world... if you happen to be Jeff Relf.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Impact of two spheres/balls/marbles/planets along skew paths
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• No good deed goes unpunished.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Humans Lack Genetics to Understand Physics
  • From: RichD
• Gulf Stream Slowed During Little Ice Age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Galileo "GPS" system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Metamaterial bridges the terahertz gap
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I'm up shit creek if T.J. doesn't come back soon.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I'm up shit creek if T.J. doesn't come back soon.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Impact of two spheres/balls/marbles/planets along skew paths
  • From: unsettled
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bell and non-Bell spookiness
  • From: The Thing
• Re: The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Brad Guth
• The Ghost In The Machine, banished from Mailgate
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Spooky fields and a dog on its first take-off.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Spooky fields and a dog on its first take-off.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Spooky fields and a dog on its first take-off.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: In this world there are land_Lords_ and ten_Ants_.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spooky fields and a dog on its first take-off.
  • From: Front Office
• Re: spin again
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: In this world there are land_Lords_ and ten_Ants_.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: n-body problem/variable count
  • From: Igor
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Alimony, T.J., Abramovish and McCaw.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: How to avoid the alimony tax.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relf understands T.J. best.
  • From: T Wake
• spin again
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Galileo "GPS" system
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Polonium-210 question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Black Holes are Spin
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
  • From: Richard Herring