Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?




"Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttpppggg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164813617.406565.58820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
It has been proposed that there exists an observed predominance of
matter versus anti-matter because anti-matter was annihilated long ago,
leaving only matter. This remnant matter was supposedly the result of
an initial imbalance in the ratio of matter versus anti-matter. In
other words, there was supposedly more matter than there was
anti-matter prior to the annihilation. After the annihilation, there
was (virtually) no anti-matter remaining although there was some matter
remaining which is why we observe a predominance of matter over
antimatter. Yet, such in imbalance would violate the laws of
conservation (the conservation of energy, charge, spin, angular
momentum, etcetera). The laws of conservation require that there be a
precisely balanced ratio of matter versus antimatter, both before and
after all annihilations. For every positive, there must be an equal yet
opposite negative (and vice verse). The predominance of matter over
anti-matter may be due to the fact that although there must be equal
amounts of matter and antimatter, the matter and anti-matter need not
be distributed equally and homogenously. Rather, there may be localised
imbalances in the ratio of matter versus anti-matter (for example,
anti-matter may exist predominantly within "black holes" or their kin).
Yet, the overall (or total) ratio of matter versus anti-matter must be
precisely balanced (1:1).

Copyright 2006
All Rights Reserved

It seems to me that the statement you make here poses a large question
of what the consequences are?

Why do we even need to go to a balck hole to find antimatter? Could
there be anti-galaxies? One could seek a galaxy collision with an
anti-galaxy and that would support your theory.
The two are of such perfect symmetry that to send one into a black hole
while the other remains local breaks their symmetry artificially
doesn't it? Or are you suggesting that the black hole is a symmetric
inversion? That would be quite a space especially considering the
multiple black holes that we supposedly observe. Would there be a one
to one mapping? The antiverse identical? A neat deterministic quagmire
ensues. Their being non-identical is acceptablte I suppose but the
symmetry problem is still there.

Neat idea.

-Tim



There is *NO* matter anti-matter asymmetry, None at all. There is just as
much matter as there is antimatter in the universe. If there weren't it
would imply baryon non-conservation, and there is no evidence that this is
so. Just because we haven't found the antimatter yet doesn't mean it doesn't
exist. It just means our ideas are bollixed somewhere. To start with there
is a very simple modification to the equivalence principle that goes a good
ways toward showing what happens when matter and antimatter are created in a
homogenous admixture and allowed to evolve naturally over time - but 30
years ago when I proposed the solution it was deemed 'too simple' and
instead string theory was created as an excuse to keep the eggheads on the
government dole for the perpetual future, thereby eventually destroying
physics in the process and resulting in the mess we now find ourselves in,
where we are seemingly unable to answer even the most simple of
questions...give it a few more decades and we will no doubt be arguing once
again about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Greysky


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lord DArcy and steam elevators
    ... matter and anti-matter did cancel themselves out, ... there are antimatter asteroids in our own Belt, ... This features a lone antimatter system (planet and protosun) from outside ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Anti-Matter and the Big Bang
    ... >it is totally consistent to say that anti-matter is nothing more than ... >real matter moving backward in time. ... >to postulate a different type of matter – ordinary matter moving ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Antimatter Imbalance Violates Conservation Laws?
    ... matter versus anti-matter because anti-matter was annihilated long ago, ... leaving only matter. ... anti-matter prior to the annihilation. ... anti-matter may exist predominantly within "black holes" or their kin). ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lord DArcy and steam elevators
    ... and why matter and anti-matter didn't cancel themselves out exactly. ... have had time to travel between galaxies (e.g. photons, ... Particles of antimatter coming from antimatter ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Anti-Matter and the Big Bang
    ... it is totally consistent to say that anti-matter is nothing more than ... real matter moving backward in time. ... to postulate a different type of matter – ordinary matter moving ...
    (sci.physics.particle)

Quantcast