Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

Eric Gisse wrote:
Paul wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Paul wrote:

[...]

So I ask again...how exactly is the 2nd law of thermodynamics in
question?

Your long, LONG diatribes about electrical engineering just lack
that....relation...to thermodynamics that the threat title suggests.


As stated many times, it depends how rigid your interpretation of the
2nd law is. I proved quotes. How about this, "Energy will not flow
spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature
object."
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/seclaw.html#c3

True only as long as the low temperature object has lower entropy.
Equilibrium is maximum entropy.

All isolated objects started at room temperature, but the resistor
becomes colder than the LED in experiment #2 because the resistor is
giving more energy to the LED than the LED gives to the resistor. :-)




My experiment clearly demonstrates usable energy is flowing from the
colder resistor to the LED. Now we only need to see how rigid your
interpretation of the 2nd law is. I find that physicists who are
confronted in public seem to always adhere to the most rigid
interpretation, which again makes the 2nd law useless. On the hand,
there are physicists who during private conversation admit such an
experiment breaks the 2nd law.

You didn't do the experiment so you have no way to claim your
experiment breaks the 2nd law.

I am working on far better research. I do not need to prove
well-proven concepts. Given enough time the LED will emit photons. I
will attempt to outline to logic of both experiments to get you people
past 1-ply depth thinking. In experiment #1 the resistors absorb the
photons. So you might argue, "Gee, I don't care what you said, the
resistor in experiment #1 will remain at the same temperature as the
LED." I will then reply, "Fine, :-) in experiment #2 the LED absorbs
the photons instead of the resistor. Therefore, since the resistor is
no longer absorbing the photons then it ***MUST*** be colder and the
LED ***MUST*** be hotter." :-)


[snip]


Scientists contacting me in private are correct. Sci.physics is not a
place where real physicists hang out. I will decrease my time spent on
Sci.physics.pub. I hope you people one day awaken soon and overcome
your filthy addiction.


God Bless you all, :-)
Paul

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: First program
    ... Law #1 The first is Ohm's Law which relates voltage, curret, and ... Where V= The voltage across the resistor measured in volts. ... I am the "ILOVEGNU" signature virus. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
    ... |I hate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ... "Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to ... done to accomplish this flow. ... resistor generates more power than the metal film resistor. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Help on Intermediate test PSE
    ... You have managed Ohm's Law but have yet to progress to ... and a resistor.. ... noticed the diode was the wrong way around.... ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
    ... |I hate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ... Consider a carbon resistor in series with a metal film resistor. ... Voltage noise: V ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
    ... |I hate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ... Consider a carbon resistor in series with a metal film resistor. ...
    (sci.physics)