Re: Leibniz vs Newton

Eric Gisse wrote:

[snip]
They are trying to make string theory predict something. Exactly
opposite to what you attempt to do. You actively *avoid* making
predictions.

Not true. I am trying to make a threory predict something.

My ideas share the same standing with string theory.

Your response to this is that "string theory isn't physics".

Well, the only people in the world interested in string theory are
physicists.

Are you a physicist?


[snip]
My ideas cannot be falsified, verified, or used. But they can be
discussed. And they are as equally appropriate for "physics" as string
theory is.

Thank you for admitting your ideas are worthless. Now go away.

Discussion is not worthless. Perhaps the way you practice it.

.

Quantcast