Re: Leibniz vs Newton


Michael Hell wrote:
On Dec 5, 3:31 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MobyDikc wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
MobyDikc wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
MobyDikc wrote:

[snip]

I've suggested, by citing the wikipedia, that physics is based on the
scientific method, and the scientific method includes a conjectural
stage in hypothesis creation.

For the last 3 years you have been in the "I have an idea" stage. When
are you going to actually put that idea in a quantifiable form?

First, we would need sufficient knowledge of the brain to recreate the
neuronal wiring and instruments required to make a mathematical model
of an observer.

Then we'd need the computing power to do it.

You have no idea what an observer means in physics, do you?


I have an idea of what it should mean.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/observer.htm

That is a halfway decent primer.

If you actually knew what an observer is in the physics sense, you
wouldn't be talking about simulating an observer or *** like that.




[snip whining about string theory]

Anything that talks about string theory gets ignored. Why don't we talk
about you, Mike?


Since you are persistant. Sure.


In your previous postings from early 2003 you explained you haven't
seen physics since highschool. Where you attempt to talk about
contemporary physics you often make mistakes and are confused by simple
concepts.

True. That's why I come here. To find the shortcomings in my knowledge.

Incorrect - you come here to push your philosophical babble. You might
tell yourself you come here to learn, but you don't act like it.

When was the last time you tried looking at a journal article, or a
physics textbook?


You've been adament about being unhelpful.

And adament about talking about me as a person.

Might I suggest that you try to get to know a few people in real life.
Maybe a girl. Then you might not be so frustrated and desperate for
human interaction here. Then maybe ideas can take center stage. Just an
idea.



In your latest postings, you evidently still do not understand calculus
along with highschool physics. You apparently have knowledge of
computer programming at some level, which you seem to believe grants
you the ability to do physics given your treatment of pseudocode as the
same as physics.

Just because you're unfamiliar with the code doesn't mean it was psuedo
code.

Who gives a ***?


My examples are compilable and do execute.

However, I've retired and don't do programming anymore.

Oh, so you are going to take a crack at physics now that you are
retired?

I'm sure the scientific community is *thrilled* that yet another idiot
who was never really interested in physics decided that it needs to be
broken down and rebuilt now that he has some free time on his hands.



You struggle with concepts taught in introductory physics courses yet
you think you can reinvent physics using philosophy and catchphrases?


It may seem unlikely to you, but its not impossible.

Actually, it is quite impossible. You don't even have a concept of what
you are attempting to replace.


Perhaps physics has reached a point where the next new ideas are going
to be such a departure from what you have, that a fresh, outside view
is what stimulates the next craze.

This is the issue: You don't know what the *** you are talking about.

You think you can re-invent physics even though your last exposure to
physics was from high school.

You haven't seen modern physics in any capacity other than whatever you
read in popularizations. You have no idea why physics is where it is
today. Hell, you don't even know *where* physics is.



You talk about mass-energy, yet you have no idea where the term comes
from or the theoretical justification for it. You talk about dark
matter, yet you are completely ignorant of the research behind it.


I'm sick of this process repeating every few months. Learn some physics
or shut the *** up, kook.

No you're not. If you were, you wouldn't engage me.

I want you to go away. We got enough retired assholes who want to
reinvent physics.

Ignoring you is obviously not working.


Why don't you either stick to physics, or go find a girl?

Multitasking is a beautiful thing.

.

Quantcast