Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter


Michael Hell wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Michael Hell wrote:

[...]

Why don't you learn some calculus now that you are retired?


Because I spend most of my time in the recording studio.

So you don't even know calculus?

Gee. That's interesting. You think you can make a contribution to
physics without even learning CALCULUS.

Leibniz's major remaining contribution was to calculus. Yet you feel
your time is better spent pushing his philosophical rambling?


When I'm not networking with others and learning about new music, I
find digital philosophy and digital physics to be interesting, two
emerging fields that happens to leave calculus in the history section.

Looks like both "digital philosophy" and "digital physics" are both
math-free.


I won't ever have to work in physics. Why shouldn't I take a chance and
start with the fertile ground for exploration, having the luxary to do
so?

After all, Leibniz invented calculus independently of Newton, and when
you do calculus, you are using Leibniz's notion, not Newton's.

And Leibniz was able to envision another type of mathematics, which
most people are realizing now exists in the form of computer programs.

And he thought that's the basis of the universe. Not calculus, or
anything born from it.

How fortunate for you since now you don't actually have to learn
anything complex....like math.

.

Loading