Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation


Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1165569544.089418.10300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:

I'm sure you'd prefer an arcane mathematical description which would
probably be incomprehensible to most people. Yet, I believe a simple
animated visual illustration would be a more effective way to
communicate and even PROVE what I am attempting to convey.

And have no relevance to reality.


We'll see whether it does or not. The only way to know is to study a
real black hole. Eventually, this will be accomplished. Then we will
see whether my ideas have any relevance to reality. I have yet to
actually commence work upon the animations (not to say my imagination
hasn't kept busy with "pre-production"). In the interim, a way to
simplify my argument is to imagine a black hole within a black hole.
The two black holes are twin universes which are entangled the way that
quantum particles are entangled so as to be one particle in multiple
locations. If one of the black holes rotates, the other rotates. If one
moves, the other moves in the same direction the same (relative)
distance. So, if one moves and the other moves with it, there is no
relative motion between them. The mechanics become more complex if we
introduce a third black hole within the first, which would actually
require the introduction of a fourth and a fifth black hole, since the
black holes are paired (entangled pairs). The fourth black hole would
be not exist with the first. It would be paired with the first hole
inside of a fifth hole. This fifth hole would actually be paired with a
sixth, and these two would exist within a seventh black hole which is
paired with an eighth inide of a ninth hole which is paired with a
tenth hole, ad infinitum. Despite the apparent infinity, there is
actually only one hole in many places at once. Any motion between the
holes which exist inside of a hole will be "mirrored" by all the other
holes and it becomes impossible to determine which is actually moving,
perhaps even in the case of angular momentum (or spin) of a hole,
primarily because these holes are all actually one which means that any
motion of a hole is relative to itself as opposed to another. Of
course, when I say black hole...I am referring to a warping of
space-time or the ("hyperspatial" neutronium condensate) Aether and not
a construct of actual matter or energy which exists atop this Aethereal
space-time. The only motion which would be absolute would be the motion
of matter and energy existing inside of a black hole, the motion of
which said matter and energy is relative to the black in which it
exists. To simplify my argument further, I ask: Since the Aether is
pure void, or nothingness, comprised of opposites which neutralise and
form a void, how can nothingness actually move? The answer is that it
doesn't move. The motion of Aether cannot be absolute because it is not
relative to anything. The only actual motion which can exist is the
motion of matter and energy relative to this nothingness. One might be
inclined to question how one can define motion relative to something
which doesn't exist, yet this nothingness DOES exist. It is very real.
In fact, matter and energy wouldn't exist if this "nothingness" didn't
exist. The Aether is an illusory nothingness, comprised of equal and
opposite particles of "somethingness". Matter and energy are merely the
result of the nothingess separating into it's constituent positve and
negative components. Since matter and energy are actually constructs of
the Aether, one might be inclined to question how the motion of matter
and energy could be any more absolute than the motion of the Aether.
The answer is that the motion of the illusory construct of Aether which
we call matter and energy is absolute relative to the boundaries of the
Aether, whether it is a boundary defining the edge of the universe or a
boundary defining the end of time (and thereby frequency), or both.

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • A fathomable set of issues
    ... "Ray Haddad" wrote in message ... > This is an unbelievable image from NASA and the European ... A black hole that by a direct linear measurement was quite ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
    ... o The energy that can be supplied to a collision by the Large ... Hadron Collider is a piffle, compared to similar collision ... There is evidence that a black hole has been created in particle ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Y.O.O the "self proclaimed GR expert". (ABSOLUTELY no help)
    ... The mass, eventuyally, gets converted to energy, photos, for the most ... that "mass *cannot* enter a Black Hole. ... possibility that no energy enters the Black Hole at all. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_El_fin_del_mundo_en_seis_d=EDas=3F?=
    ... El diez de septiembre van a intentar crear un "Black Hole". ... han visto la película ya sabe lo que es, es un agujero en el espacio ... con todo el sistema solar y posiblemente algo mas. ...
    (soc.culture.colombia)
  • Re: El fin del mundo en seis días?
    ... El diez de septiembre van a intentar crear un "Black Hole". ... han visto la película ya sabe lo que es, es un agujero en el espacio ... con todo el sistema solar y posiblemente algo mas. ...
    (soc.culture.colombia)