Re: passive radar theory refrence needed
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:18:33 GMT
On a sunny day (Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:56:06 +0100) it happened Helmut Wabnig
<.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wrote in
<7fuep2pnpmrbkjck7c1m193l025lej6ijg@xxxxxxx>:
On 30 Dec 2006 19:51:21 -0800, "Peter Divos" <pdivos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,need two or more antennas. Two ears, and listen.
I heard there are some types of radar which operate passively, this
means, they dont send any signal and dont wait for the echo, but they
get some random electromagnetic waves from the air which are reflected
on objects as well and it is possible get some image in exchange of
some computation.
I also heard of a swiss company who are using the same principle but in
geology, seismology, oil exploration. They dont produce any signal
(like explosion under the surface) but instead use very sensitive
detectors and catch the random seismic noise from the earth which
reflects as well and get the image based on this.
So. I am interested in the mathematical and algorithmical part of the
topic. Does anyone know any good references? Like keywords or book
titles.
Many thanks
Peter
Localizing lighning flashes is an application
http://www.aldis.at/
The theory is basically ident, if you send a signal and wait for the
reflections, or just listen to what is coming along, acoustically or
electromagnetic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_radar
In fact the eyes are a nice passive radar, using available electromagnetic
sources to create a 3D picture.
The subject is 'lens'.
.
- References:
- passive radar theory refrence needed
- From: Peter Divos
- passive radar theory refrence needed
- Prev by Date: Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
- Next by Date: Re: The new wheel
- Previous by thread: passive radar theory refrence needed
- Next by thread: Re: passive radar theory refrence needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|