sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: origin of U in tension
  • From: Dumbledore_
• origin of U in tension
  • From: Fuzzy . me
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• The 1935 Duesenberg SJ Mormon Meteor Speedster ( with a coool exhaust pipe ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: hanson
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: PD
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Newtonian gravity solutions
  • From: Igor
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Re: A Closed Parametric Curve
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.8 More on Mass/Energy
  • From: soutjhyDin
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: Justin Lewis
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: soutjhyDin
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.9 More on Mass/Energy
  • From: soutjhyDin
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Cranks Reply
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: Cranks Reply
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Graduate Level Math Books For Sale
  • From: dgiaimo
• Re: Cosmic gravity, density and pressure.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vista and global warming.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Jihad needs scientists
  • From: Cranks Reply
• Vista and global warming.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Demra
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Demra
• Re: t-butanol vs. n-butanol melting vs. boiling points
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Cosmic gravity, density and pressure.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is Wave characteristics ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cosmic gravity, density and pressure.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: c-v|c+v
  • From: Sue...
• Re: c-v|c+v
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: WTC 7 is 9/11 key
  • From: George
• t-butanol vs. n-butanol melting vs. boiling points
  • From: renai
• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: WTC 7 is 9/11 key
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 83.9 More on Mass/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.8 More on Mass/Energy
  • From: Jim_Greenfield
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: Justin Lewis
• Quantum Gravity 83.8 More on Mass/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: franklinhu
• The Speed of Cracking
  • From: javawizard
• A Closed Parametric Curve
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: franklinhu
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 January 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Re: BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Computer chips cut energy consumption
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Air - Anti-Gravity
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: hanson
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: need ideas for what to research/report on in PHYSICS
  • From: Old Man
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: WillE1
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: PD
• Re: photon animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: mmeron
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.7: Negative Mass Fundamental?
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: Justin Lewis
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 83.7: Negative Mass Fundamental?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 810 30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Nathan Urban
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: photon animation
  • From: OG
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 810 30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: soutjhyDin
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: mmeron
• Interval before Nuclear Decay
  • From: da5id65536@xxxxxxxxx
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 810 30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.4: The Boys From Italia
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Szczepan Białek
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Tom Potter and Original Sources
  • From: justinlewis100@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: need research topic
  • From: soutjhyDin
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: c-v|c+v
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Human Skin as "An Engine"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• need research topic
  • From: Ram
• Process Engineer opening at Draper Lab in Cambridge, MA
  • From: nancy
• Re: The price you pay for rent varies a bit.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Demra
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Conceptual Questions in Statistical echanics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: c-v|c+v
  • From: Sue...
• Re: c-v|c+v
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Interpretation of electric dipole solution
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Human Skin as "An Engine"
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: malibu
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Human Skin as "An Engine"
  • From: Hampton Din
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tdp1001
• The Human Skin as "An Engine"
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.3: Entropy and Re Fundamental in QG
  • From: Hampton Din
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.4: Entropy Defenders BOmbard
  • From: Hampton Din
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Armed Mexicans chase U.S. troops from border post
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Standing on the corner with frozen fish.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Building nuclear weapons out of household materials.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: T Wake
• Fast women have to be kept " on the down low ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Standing on the corner with frozen fish.
  • From: T Wake
• Standing on the corner with frozen fish.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Modern physics the new Alchemy ?
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Old Man
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: boson boss
• Re: From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I expected something for nothing, my bad.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Buying Tonga.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: malibu
• Re: rest mass of Li
  • From: kuba_s
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: PD
• Re: DIVINE EINSTEIN: A HAUNTING PICTURE
  • From: Igor
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: malibu
• Déjà vu, I still have nothing T.J. wants.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.4: The Boys From Italia
  • From: Hampton Din
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Modern physics the new Alchemy ?
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: PD
• Re: A basic question.
  • From: PD
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: malibu
• Re: Sober bums.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Gravity"
  • From: Demra
• "Gravity"
  • From: Demra
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: malibu
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Sober bums.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: malibu
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: PD
• How a system is modeled depends on the prior knowns.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: precession, quantized
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: malibu
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: malibu
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• precession, quantized
  • From: boson boss
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 29, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: *7* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; color of the universe matches silvery white plutonium
  • From: Sue...
• Sober bums.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Diana
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Modern physics the new Alchemy ?
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Making real gravity to prove unified field theory.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Bob Cain
• BWAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahaha! (was Re: mass of the photon)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: brainless moron
  • From: tony fleming
• mass of the photon)
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: A DIALOGUE WITH Lee Smolin & PETER WOIT of Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory And the Search for Unity in Physical Law (Hardcover)
  • From: Amadeus Polonium-210
• Re: Quantum Gravity 83.6: Italia Continued
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Quantum Gravity 83.6: Italia Continued
  • From: OsherD
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 83.4: The Boys From Italia
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 83.4: Entropy Defenders BOmbard
  • From: OsherD
• BWAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahaha! (was Re: mass of the photon)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Start wreck
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Structure of A Photon
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What angle creates MAXIMUM air deflection?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Basic help with airflow calculations
  • From: lance . d . bresee
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I shouldn't be stalking T.J., asking him for shit.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Mind control a serious threat to individuals rights...
  • From: Surfer
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I shouldn't be stalking T.J., asking him for shit.
  • From: T Wake
• I shouldn't be stalking T.J., asking him for shit.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 83.3: Entropy and Re Fundamental in QG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: T Wake
• Quantum Gravity 83.2: Re Fundamental in QG
  • From: OsherD
• Say T.J., do those Dreamworks morons need a computer programmer ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: mmeron
• Re: T.J., Have you ever fished with spike ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Quantum Gravity 83.0: Re Fundamental in QG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is truly spatial ( i.e. falsely directional ).
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Curvature of Space (was Re: Some simple cosmology questions)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 83.0: Fundamental in QG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 82.7: Gas Law Not Fundamental
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A black hole is a frozen supernova, not a frozen star.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Structure of A Photon
  • From: Igor
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Gravity is inertia ( and vice versa ) but it's modeled differently.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Environmentalists are terrorists.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• My code won't run without Bill Gates' software... I'm filling his pockets.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Armed Mexicans chase U.S. troops from border post
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Structure of A Photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: T.J., Have you ever fished with spike ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Matter responsible for lack of virgins on Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Environmentalists are terrorists.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Time is truly spatial ( i.e. falsely directional ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 82.8: Reply to Hawk
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Incidence angle of diffuse radiation on a given plane
  • From: cool . bambus
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Diffraction through apertures with a rounded edge.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: T Wake
• Quantum Mechanics ( and thermodynamics ) in a nutshell.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: photon animation
  • From: OG
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: WillE1
• Quantum Gravity 82.9: QG Electromagnetism
  • From: OsherD
• Cracking the " Window Genuine Advantage " lock.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Curvature of Space (was Re: Some simple cosmology questions)
  • From: DharmaTroll
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Structure of A Photon
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: mmeron
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Colour of heavy water
  • From: Double-A
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Quantum Gravity 82.8: y/x Not Fundamental
  • From: Hawk
• Quantum Gravity 82.8: y/x Not Fundamental
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 82.7: Gas Law Not Fundamental
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness
  • From: mantaintai
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Mass of the Photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Mind control a serious threat to individuals rights...
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• What angle creates MAXIMUM air deflection?
  • From: bstevens
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: mmeron
• This is a test.
  • From: Bugaboo
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Come on Ghost, Do you really think I'm as foolish as Gisse ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Colour of heavy water
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Start wreck
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Colour of heavy water
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: T Wake
• Re: photon animation
  • From: malibu
• Burris's Unifield Field Theory: Im back!
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Colour of heavy water
  • From: John Park
• Re: Come on Ghost, Do you really think I'm as foolish as Gisse ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I'll take T.J.'s ideas over T_Wake's any day.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: What's New - Bob Park - Friday, January 26, 2007
  • From: hanson
• Start wreck
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: WillE1
• GRAVITY - Law or Theory
  • From: DRAKULIAN
• Come on Ghost, Do you really think I'm as foolish as Gisse ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 82.6: String Theory From Newton
  • From: OsherD
• Re: " Come here little boy, I've got something for you ! "
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I'll take T.J.'s ideas over T_Wake's any day.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Accidental/intensional explosions.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: DharmaTroll
• We live in an age of disposable everything, cars are like toilet paper.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: What's New - Bob Park - Friday, January 26, 2007
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Accidental/intensional explosions.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: spin9
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: Sue...
• Quantum Gravity 82.5: Restricted Riccati
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: spin9
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Efficiency is notional.
  • From: tj Frazir
• nodes in em waves
  • From: ANON.ymous
• Quantum Gravity 82.4: F = ma
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: spin9
• Re: I'll take T.J.'s ideas over T_Wake's any day.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: DCG KIT
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: CWatters
• Accidental/intensional explosions.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: CWatters
• Quantum Gravity 82.3: Additive Entropy and Tensors
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light Diameter
  • From: Sue...
• Light Diameter
  • From: spin9
• Quantum Gravity 82.2: Additive Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Efficiency is notional.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Article: Sending Einstein into a spin
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A basic question.
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: I'll take T.J.'s ideas over T_Wake's any day.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Dumbledore_
• I'll take T.J.'s ideas over T_Wake's any day.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Mass of the Photon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: sidwiki.com
• Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: sidwiki.com
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: tony fleming
• " Come here little boy, I've got something for you ! "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Mass of the Photon
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Sebastian Meznaric
• Re: Refrigerator cools one electron at a time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: Incidence angle of diffuse radiation on a given plane
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 82.1: More Re Additive Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: An Experiment In Philosophy
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 82.0: Additive Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• DCG KIT
  • From: goat pimp
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Refrigerator cools one electron at a time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: photon animation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's New - Bob Park - Friday, January 26, 2007 edited
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's New - Bob Park - Friday, January 26, 2007
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mass of the Photon
  • From: tony fleming
• Mass of the Photon
  • From: tony fleming
• What's New - Bob Park - Friday, January 26, 2007
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever Ting Tan woe culture vulture
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 81.0: --> vs =, < =
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Lensless x-ray microscope focuses on biological sample
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The actual diamond crystal
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: DharmaTroll
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Maxwell's eq in quaternion form (not a kook post!)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• The actual diamond crystal
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Quantum Gravity 81.0: --> vs =, < =
  • From: Hawk
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Quantum Gravity 81.0: --> vs =, < =
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: OG
• Re: Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photon animation
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Google Groups has its place... and its shortcomings.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: DharmaTroll
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Double-A
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: OG
• Re: photon animation
  • From: OG
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: Benjamin Huntsman, England, 1740.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Benjamin Huntsman, England, 1740.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: OG
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Benjamin Huntsman, England, 1740.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: briggs
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: Benjamin Huntsman, England, 1740.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: CWatters
• Marshall Rosenbluth
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Gareth
• Re: Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: dlzc
• Phineas, I got your metric right here, genius.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: Marcus Fox
• Benjamin Huntsman, England, 1740.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: hanson
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: RichD
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: RichD
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Nathan Urban
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Blowing bulbs...
  • From: Marcus Fox
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Joe Strout
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Joe Strout
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Joe Strout
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: T.J. can't come up with real-world estimates because he's never been there.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles up Ghost ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• T.J. can't come up with real-world estimates because he's never been there.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: T.J., Have you ever had eyes checked Ghost
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: An observation supporting the idea that galactic discs precess.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An observation supporting the idea that galactic discs precess.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: rest mass of Li
  • From: briggs
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Crowd turbulence" has deadly consequences
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A basic question.
  • From: WillE1
• How is the pressure in this tank increasing?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Conceptual Questions in Statistical echanics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New Ray Gun!
  • From: Prisoner at War
• An observation supporting the idea that galactic discs precess.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Google Groups has its place... and its shortcomings.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: malibu
• Google Groups has its place... and its shortcomings.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• rest mass of Li
  • From: kuba_s
• Re: New Ray Gun!
  • From: Prisoner at War
• Re: New Ray Gun!
  • From: Prisoner at War
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: photon animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Randy Poe
• Maxwell's eq in quaternion form (not a kook post!)
  • From: jcon
• Where does "symmetrisation postulate" come from?
  • From: Christian
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: hanson
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Conceptual Questions in Statistical echanics
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: BEAUTIFUL BABY FROM 28-YEAR-OLD SPERM -- Medical Miracle
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Google's right margin is too wide ? What right margin ? I don't see it.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Incidence angle of diffuse radiation on a given plane
  • From: cool . bambus
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: "Crowd turbulence" has deadly consequences
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: PD
• Google now has a " Hide message list " button that sticks.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Question of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Solved - Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: sts3234
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: An Experiment In Philosophy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Apeksha . Jain15
• Re: An Experiment In Philosophy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Crowd turbulence" has deadly consequences
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Pmb
• On the reference frames in 4D space
  • From: vps137
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: photon animation
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: fictitious forces
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Quantum Gravity 79.0: P(A(B vs DtDu
  • From: Bob A
• Re: Tera Herts raygun?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: New Ray Gun!
  • From: Prisoner at War
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: dlzc
• Refrigerator cools one electron at a time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: sirix
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: srp
• T.J., Where are these people ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Second SUN
  • From: Diana
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If time stops, would you notice after it restarts?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Second SUN
  • From: Diana
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Tera Herts raygun?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• I manually change " frm " to " thread " in the url bar.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Article: A tale of two heliums
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Double-A
• Need some help about the new style of this ng
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantitative finance, computational finance [jobs]
  • From: vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: dudi24
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: dudi24
• [Spam]Internet forum for electricians
  • From: zasit
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: OG
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Some simple cosmology questions
  • From: DharmaTroll
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: ny2292000
• Quantum Gravity 79.1: More Re A-->B
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another new twist on the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect (Jan 24)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: srp
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Another new twist on the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect (Jan 24)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: srp
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: PD
• Re: Efficient Engines - [ Engineering ]
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Giant pipelines of freshwater to parched lands
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: PD
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Reflection, Light & properties of "The Invisible" [ Physics ]
  • From: morpheus123
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Google's right margin is too wide ? What right margin ? I don't see it.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Google's right margin is too wide ? What right margin ? I don't see it.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: PD
• Re: WeatherMasterPro Prorofessional Weather Software, 500+ Options
  • From: mountain man
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Google's right margin is too wide ? What right margin ? I don't see it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Post and thread handling at Google Groups's has changed.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: OG
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Expanding Space
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Bush famously said, " America is addicted to oil ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Convection/Insulation question
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Article: Sending Einstein into a spin
  • From: Edward Green
• Efficient Engines - [ Engineering ]
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Expanding Space
  • From: Jack
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: Bill Habr
• Re: Giant pipelines of freshwater to parched lands
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• for tedi: inviting spam free nntp access - ul - (1/1)
  • From: al
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: dudi24
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Post and thread handling at Google Groups's has changed.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: T Wake
• Quantum Gravity 79.0: P(A(B vs DtDu
  • From: OsherD
• Post and thread handling at Google Groups's has changed.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: SCW
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: SCW
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: sirix
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Nathan Urban
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: neo
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: neo
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Bob A
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: PD
• Re: Weeding out the dross
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Stephen Hawking on waves and particles
  • From: PD
• Weeding out the dross
  • From: PD
• Re: GEM -- was Re: Electric Charges -- was Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• Why only gravity is "geometrical"?
  • From: sirix
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: sirix
• Re: Mormon, or "More Good"
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dude, That's Deep
  • From: jimp
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: hanson
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: malibu
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: PD
• Re: different boiling points of iron
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: PD
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Y.Porat
• different boiling points of iron
  • From: dudi24
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• What's math got to do with it ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Ghost in the Machine
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dude, That's Deep
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Can Gisse customize Usenet like I did, with X.CPP and X.TXT ? Likely not.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: mmeron
• Higgs signal? --- could be big, big news
  • From: PD
• Do not use newsgroups to learn physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Dude, That's Deep
  • From: jimp
• Re: Google fucked up again
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Dude, That's Deep
  • From: Sam Wormley
• LHC to be used to test string theory
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Machine Science [ Computer Science / Neuroscience / Computer Systems Engineering ]
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: T Wake
• Quantum Gravity 78.0: Russian Godels
  • From: OsherD
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: PD
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Annihilation between particles,and antiparticles ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Perfect Machine
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: jimp
• Re: Curie Effect = No Magnetic Field
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Algorithm of Virtual Machines
  • From: newstips6706
• Battery Breakthrough?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: mmeron
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: CHERRYPICKING AGAIN
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Curie Effect = No Magnetic Field
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: Igor
• Re: T.J., Have you ever clicked on conversion projects
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: Gordon
• Electric Charges -- was Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: hanson
• Controlled Fusion is here!
  • From: David LaPoint
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: V=IR, P=IV=I^2R=V^2/R, signal energy confusion.
  • From: sasha semenov
• Re: The Perfect Machine
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Ghost in the Machine
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: hanson
• Re: T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: Ben Newsam
• T.J. isn't going to be there, that's for sure.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Ghost in the Machine
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: mass of the photon
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Colour of heavy water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Curie Effect = No Magnetic Field
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"</h2></b>
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: nature of the strong/weak force
  • From: PD
• Re: V=IR, P=IV=I^2R=V^2/R, signal energy confusion.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Strange shape-what is mathematics behind it?
  • From: Mike Kamermans
• Re: Time: Relativity and Entropy?
  • From: kunzmilan
• V=IR, P=IV=I^2R=V^2/R, signal energy confusion.
  • From: Steve
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Giant pipelines of freshwater to parched lands
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13gallons...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.7: Stochastic Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.7: Stochastic Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• nature of the strong/weak force
  • From: Mike Kamermans
• provide the high quality and cost-effective optical fiber component and module products
  • From: henyi99
• provide the high quality and cost-effective optical fiber component and module products
  • From: henyi99
• CURRENT UNDER A MICROSCOPE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Giant pipelines of freshwater to parched lands
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13 gallons...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I sincerely doubt I'll be living to " a ripe old age ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Magnitude of Ocean Rise
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Graduate Level Math Books For Sale
  • From: dgiaimo
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: PD
• The Perfect Machine
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I sincerely doubt I'll be living to " a ripe old age ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Edward Green
• T.J., Have you ever driven a car 3,500 miles on just 13 gallons of diesel ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Newsam, What are you going to do with my twenty bucks ?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Time: Relativity and Entropy?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Newsam, What are you going to do with my twenty bucks ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: mmeron
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 809 22 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time: Relativity and Entropy?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real vs. Internal space (solitons)
  • From: Igor
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: mmeron
• I sincerely doubt I'll be living to " a ripe old age ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Atreides
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newsam, What are you going to do with my twenty bucks ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: Ain Ainsaar
• Re: Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Time: Relativity and Entropy?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: What speeds would I get, in Mega_Bits_Per_Second.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: greysky
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: greysky
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Newsam, What are you going to do with my twenty bucks ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• zeeman splitting
  • From: dayalharman
• zeeman splitting
  • From: dayalharman
• Real vs. Internal space (solitons)
  • From: sebire
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Double-A
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Double-A
• Re: What speeds would I get, in Mega_Bits_Per_Second.
  • From: Ben Newsam
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 22, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: BernardZ
• A note on cosmology.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: pakihaki22
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: dogma
• Re: explosives
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Can Gisse customize Usenet like I did, with X.CPP and X.TXT ? Likely not.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Can Gisse customize Usenet like I did, with X.CPP and X.TXT ? Likely not.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Hilbert spaces, other than Hermitian matrices, to represent quantum systems?
  • From: Edward Green
• Dobles can burn anything, including wood or coal.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: explosives
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: greysky
• What speeds would I get, in Mega_Bits_Per_Second.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Hilbert spaces, other than Hermitian matrices, to represent quantum systems?
  • From: Hatem Abdelghani
• Re: More userChrome.CSS and userContent.CSS for FireFox 2.0.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.6: Incredible Conformity in Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: explosives
  • From: STUARTe
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.6: Incredible Conformity in Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Synchrotron accelerates neutral molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Re: explosives
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: OG
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: explosives
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: explosives
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: explosives
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: explosives
  • From: OG
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: OG
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: maxwell
• New IRC Channel: #moderncalcs
  • From: RadSurfer
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: maxwell
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Causality as involving "synthesis" in addition to analysis
  • From: srp
• Re: antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Maybe T.J. found a way to consume one tenth the steam... hell if I know.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• antimatter imbalance and moving backwards in time
  • From: maxwell
• Re: explosives
  • From: mmeron
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: MathMagician
• Project Finance Models Membership Website Launched
  • From: Orion
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Nomed
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: malibu
• Maybe T.J. found a way to consume one tenth the steam... hell if I know.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: explosives
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: explosives
  • From: Edward Green
• Causality as involving "synthesis" in addition to analysis
  • From: Scott H
• Re: No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: explosives
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: srp
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Interaction of EM radiation with matter
  • From: Nomed
• Re: explosives
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: explosives
  • From: Shadowland
• Mormon, or "More Good"
  • From: Jong Kim
• temperature in a bundle of wires
  • From: bertwistle
• temperature in a bundle of wires
  • From: bertwistle
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: More userChrome.CSS and userContent.CSS for FireFox 2.0.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dude... Sugar is not this sweet, I'm just tellin' ya.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• explosives
  • From: STUARTe
• Dude... Sugar is not this sweet, I'm just tellin' ya.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• T.J. gave me a lump of coal for Christmas.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• The Planck Level Plain
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Doing something half-assed with a 700+ PSI steam plant will kill you.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: More userChrome.CSS and userContent.CSS for FireFox 2.0.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: stable atoms also decay?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• stable atoms also decay?
  • From: speedy
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• More userChrome.CSS and userContent.CSS for FireFox 2.0.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Art of Counting TIME
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• re:String theory - size of quark vs. size of string
  • From: Action Jackson
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If CO2 traps heat, then we would have cooler days,
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: picture of photon
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Trying to find some particular physics humour
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trying to find some particular physics humour
  • From: mmeron
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Nickhotep
• Mean and extreme velocity calculations or estimates
  • From: Gordon
• Re: No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• picture of photon
  • From: malibu
• Trying to find some particular physics humour
  • From: clueless
• The Art of Counting TIME
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Hilbert spaces, other than Hermitian matrices, to represent quantum systems?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.4: Adding Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.4: Adding Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Hilbert spaces, other than Hermitian matrices, to represent quantum systems?
  • From: hatemghani
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: the physics of arthritis
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: PD
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Edward Green
• the physics of arthritis
  • From: malibu
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Atreides
• Re: symmetry of the stress tensor and conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• I can operate a hula hoop- and I'm 57- and the funny part is- you should be able to also- and I know how you could!
  • From: malibu
• Re: New class of materials called "nanopolymers"
  • From: whattodo
• Re: Strange shape-what is mathematics behind it?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Going from Seattle to Key West Florida on one tank of gasoline.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Double-A
• New class of materials called "nanopolymers"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: vanep
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• What'a New by Bob Park - Friday, January 19, 2007
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Giant pipelines of freshwater to parched lands
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: Randy Poe
• No small victory for the open source concept.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: "Is More Than Half a Brain Needed?"
  • From: Igor
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Double-A
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: gas discharge tube info wanted
  • From: MarkX
• Re: I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: Screenshots of my ( UTF-8 encoded ) CSS rules for FireFox 1.5...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Science Fair
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• [Laymen Question] I don't understand the "FTL Breaks Causality" thing
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: A "molecular carrier" that can transport carbon dioxide molecules
  • From: hanson
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.3: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: huangxienchen
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.3: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.2: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.2: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.1: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How cold Earth w/o moon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.1: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: huangxienchen
• A "molecular carrier" that can transport carbon dioxide molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.1: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.1: More Re Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: mmeron
• COROT sees first light (Jan 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: mmeron
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: PD
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strange shape-what is mathematics behind it?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Strange shape-what is mathematics behind it?
  • From: Jim Black
• Anybody a way to refute, waste the idea of Afterlife???
  • From: syntotic
• Re: Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Photonic Schroedinger cat breaks record
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pendulum swings away from dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: hanson
• Neutrino detector is compact yet sensitive
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are Some Mormons Demons
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Are Some Mormons Demons
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: A question abount induction, solar flares and Earths magnetic filed.
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: A question abount induction, solar flares and Earths magnetic filed.
  • From: jimp
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: A question abount induction, solar flares and Earths magnetic filed.
  • From: WaveMechanic
• A question abount induction, solar flares and Earths magnetic filed.
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: PD
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: hanson
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are Some Mormons Demons
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: PD
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT)
  • From: Mozart21
• Q: shadow of a ball bearing in laser light
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: Bob
• The " Wave-Particle Duality " is synthetic, not intrinsic.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: gas discharge tube info wanted
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Strange shape-what is mathematics behind it?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: Mr. CaN
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT)
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Double-A
• Magnet Shapes and relative strength
  • From: Brainsludge
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Boundary conditions on Fluid Dynamics question
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Boundary conditions on Fluid Dynamics question
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• what is the width of a single photon?
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: Screenshots of my ( UTF-8 encoded ) CSS rules for FireFox 1.5...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT)
  • From: Mozart21
• A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT)
  • From: Mozart21
• My dumb experiment with magnets
  • From: Bob
• gas discharge tube info wanted
  • From: MarkX
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: WillE1
• T.J.'s Sliding_Vane_Rotor.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Screenshots of my ( UTF-8 encoded ) CSS rules for FireFox 1.5...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I was right... Fearless_Johnny is 22 times faster than most tugs.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.0: Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bob A
• 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.0: Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.0: Fundamental Equation of Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• time reversal device
  • From: rambiz
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Boundary conditions on Fluid Dynamics question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Boundary conditions on Fluid Dynamics question
  • From: Keta
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Magnetic ermeability, permittivity, and conductivity of salt water
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: More perpetual motion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: sirix
• Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More perpetual motion
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Science Fair
  • From: glitch . net
• Re: More perpetual motion
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
  • From: sirix
• Progress In Science
  • From: symphony
• Re: 40% efficient solar cells will cause huge fall in oil shares
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Creation of the Universe
  • From: Virtual Shepherd
• Re: I was right... Fearless_Johnny is 22 times faster than most tugs.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I was right... Fearless_Johnny is 22 times faster than most tugs.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• THE CASE OF THE DISAPPEARING MASS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 40% efficient solar cells will cause huge fall in oil shares
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.3: Variability of the Name Sudarsky
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.3: Variability of the Name Sudarsky
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 40% efficient solar cells will cause huge fall in oil shares
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.2: Even More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.2: Even More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 40% efficient solar cells will cause huge fall in oil shares
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: State variables and their mathematical significance
  • From: renai
• Re: The Number '1'
  • From: unsettled
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: renai
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: renai
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: renai
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.1: More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• The Number '1'
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.1: More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.1: More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.0: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: More perpetual motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: More perpetual motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Magnetic ermeability, permittivity, and conductivity of salt water
  • From: Matt
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: sadgoodbye33
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.0: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: Bob A
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.0: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.0: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Google_Groups on IE7 restricts posts to a very narrow middle column.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: whitely525
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Science Fair
  • From: Marcus Fox
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: photon rotates twice per frequency
  • From: malibu
• Science Fair
  • From: glitch . net
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: photon rotates twice per frequency
  • From: Igor
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: jaded
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: jaded
• Re: Monkeys and Infinity (Was: The case for circumcision)
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: photon rotates twice per frequency
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: math notation
  • From: John C . Polasek
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: photon rotates twice per frequency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• photon rotates twice per frequency
  • From: malibu
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: thermodynamic and magnetism
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: math notation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: math notation
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: sadgoodbye33
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: sadgoodbye33
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Casual Sex: Frail woman, it's hard to tell where your next love lies, after midnight
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: jjoensuu
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: hanson
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Butterfly Effect
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Jewish Cowboy
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: mmeron
• Does a PhD in physics *really* prepare you for a variety of careers?
  • From: sadgoodbye33
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• good reference on Computational Holography?
  • From: Scott J. McCaughrin
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: hanson
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: OG
• Re: Will increased government physical science funding produce more permanent jobs?
  • From: mmeron
• Will increased government physical science funding produce more permanent jobs?
  • From: sadgoodbye33
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Monkeys and Infinity (Was: The case for circumcision)
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: thermodynamic and magnetism
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: hanson
• Re: thermodynamic and magnetism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Monkeys and Infinity (Was: The case for circumcision)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Edward Green
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Now we're getting there!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Now we're getting there!
  • From: camper
• Re: What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: kunzmilan
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 15, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: Double-A
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Book recommendations, and is John Gribbin good?
  • From: petter . haggholm
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: jimp
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 75.2: Kripke Semantics, Modal Logics, and Many-Valued Logics
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 75.2: Kripke Semantics, Modal Logics, and Many-Valued Logics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: Rudy von Massow
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: camper
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: camper
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: jimp
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Robert S
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: camper
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• What's New: HIGGS LIGHT: MAYBE THE TEVATRON STILL HAS SHOT AT IT
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: jimp
• Re: Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Simple freezing of water
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Simple freezing of water
  • From: camper
• Thermo 101 - 2nd Law Clarification
  • From: renai
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Atreides
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: mmeron
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 75.1: Jansana in Stanford and Multivalued Logics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cell to cell tap...
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 75.0: Stanford and Multivalued Logics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: mmeron
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• magnetism and thermodynamics
  • From: Rudy von Massow
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Cell to cell tap...
  • From: Susan
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: thermodynamic and magnetism
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Igor
• Re: math notation
  • From: Igor
• Re: Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: Gordon
• thermodynamic and magnetism
  • From: Rudy von Massow
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Golly, that was easy...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: jimp
• Re: Butterfly Effect
  • From: WaveMechanic
• galaxy rotation curves
  • From: malibu
• Re: math notation
  • From: jsquarek@xxxxxxxxx
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Retnec
• Butterfly Effect
  • From: rpcarnell
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 74.0: Role of Probability in Decoherence
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 74.0: Role of Probability in Decoherence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Symmetry of the stress tensor -- summary
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Ignorance on parade
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Standards are like items on a menu, we pick and chose'em.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: PHYSICS!? Near God, eh? You have to be old, bald, fat... (bioterrorism)
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Ignorance on parade
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: PHYSICS!? Near God, eh? You have to be old, bald, fat... (bioterrorism)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Best aute diagnostics Plus OBDII Error Code Database
  • From: exp(j*pi/2)
• Re: Simple question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• I've changed the subject line (was Re: <this subject line should really be changed>)
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: jimp
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: malibu
• Re: PHYSICS!? Near God, eh? You have to be old, bald, fat... (bioterrorism)
  • From: syntotic
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: malibu
• Re: about work
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: NotMyRealName
• Iran: Come "attack" me :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Simple question
  • From: OG
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Standards are like items on a menu, we pick and chose'em.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• about work
  • From: matt13601
• Friction and GNP at MIT
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: jimp
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Big bang - unformed and void - tohu and bohu
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Best aute diagnostics Plus OBDII Error Code Database
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Test of Whether Postings are Getting Thru
  • From: James Aforth
• Re: Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: James Aforth
• Test of Whether Postings are Getting Thru
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: math notation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 73.0: Probabilistic Perception Underlies Supersymmetry
  • From: OsherD
• Re: math notation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Metallized "Emergency Blankets" Heat Loss
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Orbital Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Orbital Question
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: math notation
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: My userContent.CSS now ensures that inline images never overwrite text.
  • From: T Wake
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Standards are like items on a menu, we pick and chose'em.
  • From: T Wake
• math notation
  • From: jsquarek@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• My userContent.CSS now ensures that inline images never overwrite text.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Standards are like items on a menu, we pick and chose'em.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• T_Wake, Would you like to piss off Dan Espen ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: malibu
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: malibu
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• proton plasma, electron plasma make up DM?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Sound breaks the light barrier
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Pete Best
• Re: Simple question
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Simple question
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Simple question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Simple question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.2: How Supersymmetry Relates Platonic Ideals Relates to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.2: How Supersymmetry Relates Platonic Ideals Relates to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sound breaks the light barrier
  • From: hanson
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Sound breaks the light barrier
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.1: Seiberg's New Paper on Gauge Mediation Relates Platonic Ideals Relates to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.1: Seiberg's New Paper on Gauge Mediation Relates Platonic Ideals Relates to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.0: Platonic Ideals Relate to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.0: Platonic Ideals Relate to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 72.0: Platonic Ideals Relate to Probable Influence/Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: I _Am_ testing my userContent.CSS ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: Phineas T. takes it up the poop shoot
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: OG
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: Phineas T. takes it up the poop shoot
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Phineas T. takes it up the poop shoot
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Phineas T. takes it up the poop shoot
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Simple question
  • From: OG
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 808 January 12, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein,Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: I _Am_ testing my userContent.CSS ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: malibu
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: malibu
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: malibu
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Simple question
  • From: The_Man
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Simple question
  • From: matt13601
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Anything beyond " Hello World " makes the layman's head spin.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Pete Best
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: The_Man
• Re: <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: ulmo
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: Igor
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: Igor
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• black matter being sucked into black holes?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: Igor
• Quick cosmology question
  • From: Pete Best
• Re: NMR finds holes in nuclear waste storage
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quick cosmology question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Unified Field Theory
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gas expansion turbine
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Pete Best
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Gas expansion turbine
  • From: jimp
• The PRIME Number '7'
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: The_Man
• Gas expansion turbine
  • From: Richard
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Anything beyond " Hello World " makes the layman's head spin.
  • From: Dan Espen
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Richard
• Re: NMR finds holes in nuclear waste storage
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Richard
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: Chumley
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: Dan Espen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums
  • From: Chumley
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Assorted High Current Rechargeable Batteries for sale.
  • From: Scott
• Best aute diagnostics Plus OBDII Error Code Database
  • From: Scott
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: vlcek
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Geometry is not math - it is theoretical physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetic force
  • From: Richard
• Magnetic force
  • From: Richard
• Re: NMR finds holes in nuclear waste storage
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: I work at home in a mostly pitch black room.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: briggs
• Re: How do I make the <br> tag act like a horizontal tab ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I've become a hard-core userContent.CSS junkie !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: T Wake
• I _Am_ testing my userContent.CSS ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Anything beyond " Hello World " makes the layman's head spin.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The more testing, the better.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: People who Write ( instead of just reading ), prefer fixed-width fonts.
  • From: T Wake
• I work at home in a mostly pitch black room.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: You're such a nice guy, you'll surely go to heaven. Too Right !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: malibu
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: " The lady doth protest too much, methinks. "
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: hpspt
• Re: " The lady doth protest too much, methinks. "
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: " The lady doth protest too much, methinks. "
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: " <link> " commands fail when the character encodings don't match.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• " The lady doth protest too much, methinks. "
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• " <link> " commands fail when the character encodings don't match.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Where can I buy liqui crystal ? ***************
  • From: hpspt
• Re: anisotropic liquid ***************
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Unified Field Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometry is not math - it is theoretical physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: jimp
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: WillE1
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Geometry is not math - it is theoretical physics
  • From: yurik
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: malibu
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: malibu
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: NMR finds holes in nuclear waste storage
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: satansgoats
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: jimp
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: jimp
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: The_Man
• How do I get rid of air bubbles in a tank full of water?
  • From: jrenfree
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: The Unified Field Theory
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• The Unified Field Theory
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Are Quasars Really THAT Far Away?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Navillus
• Re: Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Data Physics: A Nightmare in Physics
  • From: ~~NoMad~~
• is there an english translation of 'Théorie nouvelle de l'action cappillaire' by Poisson?
  • From: zhangyilei
• Re: thermodynamics
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Are Quasars Really THAT Far Away?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Are Quasars Really THAT Far Away?
  • From: freeearthdotorg
• thermodynamics
  • From: ulmo
• Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Navillus
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: jimp
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: mmeron
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: recipe for a light wave
  • From: The_Man
• The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Pete Best
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• recipe for a light wave
  • From: malibu
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: The Rocket Scientist
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Like a junkie, I need a fix !
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: Peaceful_Kaos
• Re: What is the difference between Hilbert Space and Liouville space in Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Electro-optic effect
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• What is the difference between Hilbert Space and Liouville space in Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: sunnylele
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: Mike
• Re: Geometry is not math - it is theoretical physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Like a junkie, I need a fix !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: QM's amazing denial of common sense
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• anisotropic liquid ***************
  • From: hpspt
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: Diana
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: BRINGING EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE TO PERFECTION
  • From: Sam Wormley
• NMR finds holes in nuclear waste storage
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Light squeezes through nano coax
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can't post or read messages
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: String Hypothesis
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: String Hypothesis
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Can't post or read messages
  • From: Gordon
• Re: symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• symmetry of stress and strain tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• <this subject line should really be changed>
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: String Hypothesis
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• String Hypothesis
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.1: More Re Logarithms Reverse Scales
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.1: More Re Logarithms Reverse Scales
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: malibu
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: brad
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Brian L Scipioni
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: malibu
• Seth Lloyd and Stephen Wolfram both claim our universe acts like a quantum computer.
  • From: fitz
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andro
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Andro
• Re: How do I make the <br> tag act like a horizontal tab ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ** Ode to a black hole. **
  • From: Andro
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• How do I make the <br> tag act like a horizontal tab ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: PD
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My new wrapping system ( for JavaScript and <style> blocks ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• My new wrapping system ( for JavaScript and <style> blocks ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Sunlight Rings
  • From: GraemeC
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Mike
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Mike
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andro
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Mike
• Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• You're such a nice guy, you'll surely go to heaven. Too Right !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: JavaScript in FireFox 1.5 is known to have a parsing bug.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Anything beyond " Hello World " makes the layman's head spin.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: JavaScript in FireFox 1.5 is known to have a parsing bug.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• The more testing, the better.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• JavaScript in FireFox 1.5 is known to have a parsing bug.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Oddly, whitespace after a " return " statement can't be wrapped.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: People who Write ( instead of just reading ), prefer fixed-width fonts.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• People who Write ( instead of just reading ), prefer fixed-width fonts.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.0: Logarithms Reverse Scales
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Loop_Until() is just an easy/safe/consistent way to...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• What does IMTranslator.NET look like to you ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Some more elementary questions
  • From: Andro
• Bert's " patent " for everyday fusion.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Andro
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: This is no " Wave-Particle Duality ".
  • From: fh
• testx
  • From: Kanuk
• Re: The case for circumcision
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Some more elementary questions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: describing angular velocity in three dimensions around a single axis
  • From: John C . Polasek
• ** Ode to a black hole. **
  • From: Andro
• Re: flying discs
  • From: Andro
• Re: flying discs
  • From: Gordon
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flying discs
  • From: Andro
• Re: I've become a hard-core userContent.CSS junkie !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• This is no " Wave-Particle Duality ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• flying discs
  • From: malibu
• Re: Neat motor
  • From: Richard Herring
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: briggs
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Andro
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: mmeron
• Hubble Observations Provide Insight into Planet Birth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Oddly, whitespace after a " return " statement can't be wrapped.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: Mike
• Re: Liquid acousto optic deflector*********
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: PD
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: malibu
• Re: 666 people are knocking on our door.
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Flying Saucers
  • From: boson boss
• Liquid acousto optic deflector*********
  • From: hpspt
• Flying Saucers
  • From: Diana
• Does deltaE = c^2*deltaM (E=m*c^2) always apply?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Confusing " models " with true causality ( and false randomness ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Confusing " models " with true causality ( and false randomness ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I've become a hard-core userContent.CSS junkie !
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: CWatters
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• I've become a hard-core userContent.CSS junkie !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: photon's wavefunction
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: ------- Dark Matter --------
  • From: brad
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Andro
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Andro
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 70.0: U.K. and USA Explain Dark Energy Via Exponentials
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 70.0: U.K. and USA Explain Dark Energy Via Exponentials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• A simple question on basics of NMR: what is saturation rate?
  • From: sunnylele
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Andro
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Andro
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Freg
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: Andro
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: hanson
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: moschops
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Igor
• #moderncalcs a new IRC Channel
  • From: RadSurfer
• Re: question about radars
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Wimpie
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: malibu
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: describing angular velocity in three dimensions around a single axis
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: describing angular velocity in three dimensions around a single axis
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Do the redshift observations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Fusion requires extreme pressure and _Density_.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: PD
• Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Israel planning a pre-emptive stikes on Iran
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Andro
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Andro
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: pispaspos
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Freg
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Andro
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.1: More on Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
  • From: greg
• Re: Sunlight Rings
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Sound source?
  • From: greg
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Magnet Static electricity = attraction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Sunlight Rings
  • From: GraemeC
• Sound source?
  • From: pispaspos
• describing angular velocity in three dimensions around a single axis
  • From: Wiredchop
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 08, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Andro
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.1: More on Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.1: More on Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.0: Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.0: Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Direction of electron flow relative to magnetic field and polarity
  • From: Robin
• The Spring And The Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 68.0: U.K. and ASU Rescue Brane Theory and Quintessence Via PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 68.0: U.K. and ASU Rescue Brane Theory and Quintessence Via PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 68.0: U.K. and ASU Rescue Brane Theory and Quintessence Via PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Christians are fucking liars
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: question about radars
  • From: jimp
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Robin
• Re: A few facts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ------- Dark Matter --------
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: question about radars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: ------- Dark Matter --------
  • From: brad
• question about radars
  • From: hadi . lovespace
• Re: A few facts
  • From: Michael Hell
• ------- Dark Matter --------
  • From: Fleckz328
• Unifying all classical force equations
  • From: srp
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: A few facts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• test
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Atreides
• Re: test
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz
• test
  • From: kanuk
• A few facts
  • From: Michael Hell
• Once again, monospaced fonts save the day !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• test
  • From: kanuk
• Horizontal scrolling is now almost a thing of the past for me.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help for a project
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Jim Black
• test
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Help for a project
  • From: Peaceful_Kaos
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Mike
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: jet engine
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Sci.Physics' X Report ...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Szczepan Białek
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: vlcek
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: vlcek
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: Mo
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: change in momentum: problem
  • From: Robert S
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: Robert S
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: fisikos
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: Edward Green
• Instantaneous radius of a rotation
  • From: Atreides
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: From my string of posts, two things are obvious...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: From my string of posts, two things are obvious...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: From my string of posts, two things are obvious...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: An essay on inductive reasoning
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Physicists make religion crystal clear
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: This Divine Creation: Without QM Fraud!
  • From: MTwain
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: OG
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 67.0: Einstein-Aether Theory Gives More Details on Black Holes-Mass Relationships
  • From: greg
• More music :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: From my string of posts, two things are obvious...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: An essay on inductive reasoning
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: change in momentum: problem
  • From: Luca
• Re: change in momentum: problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• From my string of posts, two things are obvious...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Mike Holmes
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Mike Holmes
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Most coders are picky about whitespace.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Google now looks like this to me...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Sam Wormley
• " input, select, option " should all be one line high.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Most coders are picky about whitespace.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Google now looks like this to me...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Mike Holmes
• Re: Most coders are picky about whitespace.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Paralink.COM uses too-small pixel units ( instead of scaled " em " units )
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Google now looks like this to me...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Most coders are picky about whitespace.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Google now looks like this to me...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• demonstration of special relativity via homopolar motor
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: wg
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: T Wake
• An essay on inductive reasoning
  • From: Scott H
• What do you make out of this paper?
  • From: Mike
• My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• change in momentum: problem
  • From: Luca
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 67.0: Einstein-Aether Theory Gives More Details on Black Holes-Mass Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: PD
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: The Thing
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: moschops
• Re: Negative Refractive Index at Optical Wavelengths
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: binary stars
  • From: moschops
• Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• Re: The hunger disease
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: mr_bumpkin
• OT: Suppose Global Warming Is True
  • From: Mike Holmes
• Negative Refractive Index at Optical Wavelengths
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: nearest star much closer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• nearest star much closer
  • From: Mo
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Olber's Paradox?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gee, that was easy after all...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gee, that was easy after all...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• My ( UTF-8 to UTF-16 ) line-wrapper for .HTM files.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: greg
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Work Done
  • From: Pmb
• Lakes of methane spotted on Titan (Jan 5)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicists make religion crystal clear
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Robert S
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: The Thing
• Re: Work Done
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What's New -- Bob Park -- Friday, January 5, 2007
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Work Done
  • From: iitaspirant2009
• Re: weight = mass or force?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• weight = mass or force?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Olber's Paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Gee, that was easy after all...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: need help: phase anti-phase
  • From: bowman53
• Re: I can hang FireFox on demand.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines, from UTF-8 or UTF-16.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Christians are fucking liars
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: need help: phase anti-phase
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: need help: phase anti-phase
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines, from UTF-8 or UTF-16.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Effectiveness of a white shield against sunlight
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: fisikos
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Effectiveness of a white shield against sunlight
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A miracle happened near the carousel
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Edward Green
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Fusion requires extreme pressure and _Density_.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Effectiveness of a white shield against sunlight
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• I can hang FireFox on demand.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Moon hopping around?
  • From: moschops
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: moschops
• Re: Effectiveness of a white shield against sunlight
  • From: PD
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Earth is Spherical??
  • From: PD
• Re: Christians are fucking liars
  • From: moschops
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Effectiveness of a white shield against sunlight
  • From: PD
• Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Sorcerer
• Moon hopping around?
  • From: donnaboo
• Wrapping HTML source code lines, from UTF-8 or UTF-16.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: need help: phase anti-phase
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• need help: phase anti-phase
  • From: bowman53
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: Sue...
• Earth is Spherical??
  • From: HellBound Angel
• Re: Physics Today: Letters: Why no Einstein's laws?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 65.0: Teleparallelism (torsion) and usual GR (curvature) as Expansion-Contraction Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 65.0: Teleparallelism (torsion) and usual GR (curvature) as Expansion-Contraction Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Measuring the Curvature of the Universe by Measuring the Curvature of the Hubble Diagram
  • From: Sam Wormley
• More Supernova Data from Ned Wright
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: How was that, again?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Nice (morbid) little diversion
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Edward Green
• How was that, again?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: Perpetual Motion Failure!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Scuba Tank Pressure Enough To Chop You In Half?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Tutoring & Homework Help
  • From: gertrude
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Physics Today: Letters: Why no Einstein's laws?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the focusing technique of a digital camera?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: pdf security problem
  • From: jimp
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Basis for primary colors...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines, ASCII or UTF-16.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: the artist
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines, ASCII or UTF-16.
  • From: Dan Espen
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines in my test suite of ( off-line ) .HTML files.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: Gordon
• Re: What is the focusing technique of a digital camera?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: homopolar motor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Altering whitespace.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: I weigh 172 pounds, standing 6'0" feet tall.
  • From: T Wake
• What is the focusing technique of a digital camera?
  • From: Jimm Avante
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 242)
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 64.0: Kerr Gravity As Quantum Gravity
  • From: nospam
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: PD
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: PD
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: The Thing
• Re: homopolar motor
  • From: boson boss
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: lister
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Stupid question about light
  • From: lister
• Stupid question about light
  • From: lister
• Altering whitespace.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The " ether " is not mutable... Very unintuitive, confusing.
  • From: vlcek
• Re: I weigh 172 pounds, standing 6'0" feet tall.
  • From: Stan
• Re: My blog about (learning) mathematics (and physics)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines, ASCII or UTF-16.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Edward Green
• The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek against NEWTON and EINSTEIN respectively.
  • From: vlcek
• Wrapping HTML source code lines, ASCII or UTF-16.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: vlcek
• Theory of relativity
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 64.0: Kerr Gravity As Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 64.0: Kerr Gravity As Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: homopolar motor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Wrapping HTML source code lines in my test suite of ( off-line ) .HTML files.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Perfect mirror energy store, Questions
  • From: Lachlan
• Wrapping HTML source code lines in my test suite of ( off-line ) .HTML files.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Greg Neill
• My blog about (learning) mathematics (and physics)
  • From: sirix
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: PD
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Luca
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 63.2: Hadrons as Black Holes (continued)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: malibu
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Luca
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 63.1: Hadrons as Black Holes (continued)
  • From: OsherD
• Nice little diversion
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: black-body radiation
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 63.0: Hadrons as Black Holes
  • From: OsherD
• black-body radiation
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• Re: what's going on behind the reflection?
  • From: rtdrury
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: berescit
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Sympathy for Cold Molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Mean free path
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Materials, strongest photoionization
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• North or south pole of our galaxy ?
  • From: berescit
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Dr. Pastor
• Simulation of Gravity?
  • From: wiiwiillwiin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: srp
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black holes.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Black holes.
  • From: Dr. Pastor
• Re: Mean free path
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• homopolar motor
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Sympathy for Cold Molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: carnot cycle
  • From: Brian Elmegaard
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: the artist
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?
  • From: top9
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Bill Snyder
• carnot cycle
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: not(input), not(textarea)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Chances are I'd have to convert the units you provide... what a pain.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: My Style Sheet Overrides ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: Gordon
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• "Gravity"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime
  • From: gert_kemm
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Color of a body and heat absorption
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: PD
• Re: A revolution in bits, etc.
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: My Style Sheet Overrides ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• not(input), not(textarea)
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Electrostatic field
  • From: mohammad . esmaeili
• exactphilosophy.net 2007
  • From: Alain Stalder
• Re: input *, textarea * { display: inline-block !important; }
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Brave new Web
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• input *, textarea * { display: inline-block !important; }
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Chances are I'd have to convert the units you provide... what a pain.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Chances are I'd have to convert the units you provide... what a pain.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• happy new and aetherial year
  • From: mountain man
• My Style Sheet Overrides ( for FireFox ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: binary stars
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.1: HUP (contd.) and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Reviews
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Blog life: Uncertain Principles
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Blog life: Uncertain Principles
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: Blog life: Uncertain Principles
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Blog life: Uncertain Principles
  • From: huangxienchen
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Blog life: Uncertain Principles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A revolution in bits, etc.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Brave new Web
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Blogging for physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: srp
• Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.0: HUP and The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.0: The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Dan Espen
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.0: The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: nospam
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: what's going on behind the reflection?
  • From: rtdrury
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: jimp
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.0: The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 62.0: The Strange Vector Generalization of PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Brablo
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How long can an inertial-navigation gyroscope coast?
  • From: Daniel P. B. Smith
• Re: Materials, strongest photoionization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: PD
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: PD
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Gareth
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Materials, strongest photoionization
  • From: James Seamore
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: hank . mitchell
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: PD
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: hank . mitchell
• Re: gravity acceleration question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• chaotic pendulum model
  • From: Jocke P
• the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner
  • From: the artist
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Weiv
• gravity acceleration question
  • From: hank . mitchell
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Mike
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: what's going on behind the reflection?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: binary stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Mike
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Mike
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: binary stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: PD
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: jimp
• Re: binary stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: binary stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: what's going on behind the reflection?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Brablo
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How long can an inertial-navigation gyroscope coast?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Sorcerer
• How long can an inertial-navigation gyroscope coast?
  • From: Daniel P. B. Smith
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: time, motion and space
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: where secret societies come from
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• what's going on behind the reflection?
  • From: rtdrury
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: You have sinned against God
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: mmeron
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.2: Spin Via Nonstandard Analysis, Lie Algebra, and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.2: Spin Via Nonstandard Analysis, Lie Algebra, and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: physics of skidding
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.1: Percolation Theory As Geometry
  • From: OsherD
• physics of skidding
  • From: bob
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• time, motion and space
  • From: jjoensuu
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.1: Percolation Theory As Geometry
  • From: nospam
• Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: jimp
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ken Seto, would you be so kind as to critique these 2 half-hour videos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.1: Percolation Theory As Geometry
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.1: Percolation Theory As Geometry
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: longitudinal and transverse vector fields
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
  • From: Brablo
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Color of a body and heat absorption
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Color of a body and heat absorption
  • From: nimmi_srivastav
• Re: Ken Seto, would you be so kind as to critique these 2 half-hour videos
  • From: unsettled
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Vintage Pocket lens book Microscopy 1904 FA
  • From: JaneyP
• Re: Ken Seto, would you be so kind as to critique these 2 half-hour videos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Ken Seto, would you be so kind as to critique these 2 half-hour videos
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: longitudinal and transverse vector fields
  • From: principalbundles
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: srp
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: CWatters
• Re: HEART OF THE UNIVERSE: NEW BOOK ANNONCEMENT
  • From: Lancelot
• Re: longitudinal and transverse vector fields
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Clocks in a constant gravitational field
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• longitudinal and transverse vector fields
  • From: principalbundles
• Re: I weigh 172 pounds, standing 6'0" feet tall.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: binary stars
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: snake sense earthquakes
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: binary stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dark radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: dark radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????
  • From: PD
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: malibu
• Re: USA "Teaching Colleges" Teach How, Not Why
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: snake sense earthquakes
  • From: malibu
• USA "Teaching Colleges" Teach How, Not Why
  • From: OsherD
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: snake sense earthquakes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: Edward Green
• standing waves and travelling waves
  • From: malibu
• dark radiation
  • From: malibu
• snake sense earthquakes
  • From: malibu
• Re: Foodborne Illnesses: Bacteria
  • From: malibu
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• I weigh 172 pounds, standing 6'0" feet tall.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Problem of the Missing Constant
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 01, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Mathematical contest
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Sorcerer
• binary stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.0: Why to Choose PI vs Nonstandard Analysis, Feynman Sum-Over-Paths vs Stat Mech
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.0: Why to Choose PI vs Nonstandard Analysis, Feynman Sum-Over-Paths vs Stat Mech
  • From: OsherD
• Mathematical contest
  • From: vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cerenkov light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Foodborne Illnesses: Bacteria
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Foodborne Illnesses: Bacteria
  • From: uri
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: resonant frequency questions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cold fusion review
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.2: Continuation of U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.2: Continuation of U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.2: Continuation of U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine