Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: "Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:23:44 -0000
"xray4abc" <lemhenyil@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1167790890.231963.27670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am one of most imaginative persons (which I can prove if
necessary).
Nothing wrong with that.
Then, if I have problems in understanding the
mainstream view regarding relativity, I am sure that THERE
ARE problems there.
( I did not have problems until I tried to understand it better!!!!)
It is clear from what you have said before that you do not
understand relativity, despite your protestations to the
contrary.
Why not tell us what you think is wrong with the train
experiment?
Martin Hogbin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: xray4abc
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- References:
- The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: Mitchell Jones
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: xray4abc
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: xray4abc
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: xray4abc
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: PD
- Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- From: xray4abc
- The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- Prev by Date: input *, textarea * { display: inline-block !important; }
- Next by Date: Re: Refrigerators with vacuum-technology
- Previous by thread: Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- Next by thread: Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|