Re: the missing particle of light- the photon's dark partner


"the artist" <niliLerner2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1167934310.756367.314900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| If you would explain amplitude in numbers of photons only it would be
| like explaining volume by counting the number of instrument playing a
| single note,

Yes, that is correct.
http://www.dubuquesymphony.org/dso/images/OrchestraChart.gif
A lot of violins, aren't there?
Ever heard a crowd at a football game?


| and you must agree that more volume is achieved by hitting
| a single string by a stronger force.

As long as you don't break the string, sure.
How loud can you shout?


| If you, or anyone else for that
| matter, can show me that I'm wrong

I just did.

at that I will be happy to drop my
| clame that there must be another particle of light other then the
| photon.

Good, drop it, you are wrong.



|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "the artist" <niliLerner2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1167848500.754303.225730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | could you please be more specific. Im here to learn.
| > |
| >
| > Certainly, but Cardinale can't help you.
| >
| > Work your way through this and ask any questions you have.
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
.