Re: Do the redshift obvservations necessarily imply a big bang?


Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1168091731.205395.255210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"malibu" <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Quasars, by more sane thought, must have different
INTRINSIC redshift than galaxies.
i.e. they are a different animal.
i.e. redshift has more than one cause.

Aliens tell you that John?

--
Saucerhead lingo #137

"(we) whupped yer incredible arse bigtime" = "we were asked a lot of
unanswerable questions we decided to avoid answering and kept repeating the
same old discredited nonsense".

hmm I guess incredible arse would describe you- yes, yess

.

Quantcast