Re: Golly, that was easy...



On 14 Jan 2007 08:58:54 -0800, "Edward Green"
<spamspamspam3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I recall straining my mind over diagrams full of angles and
perpendiculars, deriving (once) or trying to recover (many times) the
addition formulas for cosine and sine. I'm not sure when I first
discovered they were both contained, without any effort at all, in the
statement exp[i(a+b)] = exp[ia]exp[ib].

What makes the exponential function so unreasonably useful?

The efficiency of exp(ia) must be that it empowers the single scalar
'a' to keep track of both the sine and cosine of the angle. Any
scalar b can be added to a, thus forming the addition of a second
angle. Now expia * expib points to simple multiplication of the
cartesian components e.g. sin(a) to get the result of adding two
angles. Does that help?

John Polasek
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: how to get the angle from the cosine, etc.
    ... >that you already have the sine and cosine of the angle. ... What we are forced to do is to _define_ the inverse cosine as a new ... If you also know the sine, then you have a unique solution within ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: double pointers
    ... double sincostan(double angle, double *pcosine, double *ptangent) ... double cosine = cos; ... double tangent = tan; ... return sine; ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Golly, that was easy...
    ... deriving or trying to recover the ... addition formulas for cosine and sine. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Golly, that was easy...
    ... deriving or trying to recover the ... addition formulas for cosine and sine. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Golly, that was easy...
    ... deriving or trying to recover the ... addition formulas for cosine and sine. ...
    (sci.physics)