Re: More perpetual motion
- From: "T Wake" <usenet.es7at@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:34:13 -0000
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-8AA7E7.13390617012007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1168996529.975977.147270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CoreyWhite wrote:
So I got all the new parts I needed to continue my experiment with my
quadrupole motor. And I can get my generator to power a motor, and I
can get my motor to power the generator, but I have to spin one or the
other myself and let the magnets do the work to power the other. The
problem with the self generator now only seems to be magnetic friction.
Because the magnets are attracted to each other, when they spin they
slow the machine down and eventually stop next to each other with their
opposite poles tugging together. But it is so close to almost working.
Consider the money you have and will have pissed away in an effort to
do the impossible in an idiotic way as an object lesson: Attempts to
violate conservation laws are poor investments.
He's doing it to spam non-sci. newsgroups. Snip them from replies.
Well spotted. I had forgotten about his "desires" in that respect.
.
- References:
- Re: More perpetual motion
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: More perpetual motion
- Prev by Date: Re: Science Fair
- Next by Date: Re: Why momentum is a cotangent vector?
- Previous by thread: Re: More perpetual motion
- Next by thread: Re: More perpetual motion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|