Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: "Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2007 06:03:47 -0800
On Jan 26, 9:47 am, "Edward Green" <spamspamsp...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:56 am, "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 25, 4:28 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello guys
i cant find the good old 'tree' of these negsnazi wo buh asl aur "masg lest" huh.
that was so useful
is i abundant or am i missing something??
if i was abandoned
i strongly recommend to bring it back !!Wah htha apw amawoi "mre opshns" evil
You realize that your message, completely absent
your usual linguistic quirks, is even more
evidence that you've been faking.Maybe he has facultative dyslogia.
************************************************************
************************************************************
Well, you get what they pay for.
All the tweaks Google put into its obsessive need to change the
wrapper, and they didn't fix that bug (somewhere in their blizzard of
correspondence, I, at least, reported it). They may even have made it
worse. (Layers of quoted material mishandled).
Free or not (advertiser supported commercial internet), their latest
content free package change begins to put Google in the category of the
bad old companies and erode their position as the bright new clever
company, which they have been enjoying for some time.
A certain VLB (very large bank) has been undertaking a major project,
consuming significant resources and making the company newsletter. The
project is to rearrange their credit card statement, and add color
printing. American Express obsessively rearranges their website --
adding form but no obvious function. Why? Middle-management (the name
is old-fashioned, the concept ever new) needs to justify their
existence. Designers need to justify their existence. People with no
real ideas how to create value need to justify their existence. And,
in a company grown beyond a certain critical bloat (as Google evidently
has), nobody can stop them.
The party's over. Short Google.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: Double-A
- Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- References:
- Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- From: Edward Green
- Need some help about the new style of this ng
- Prev by Date: Re: Some simple cosmology questions
- Next by Date: Re: "Crowd turbulence" has deadly consequences
- Previous by thread: Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- Next by thread: Re: Need some help about the new style of this ng
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
