Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:47:37 -0500
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Zepvh.371606$1i1.149843@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PD wrote:
On Jan 29, 10:10 am, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IRT predicts that "clock time expansion" will be observed between two
inertial frames. SR says that this "clock time expansion" -- the
appearance of a clock in a different reference frame running faster
than the observer's clock -- will only happen if the observer's clock
is not in an inertial frame of reference.
But no observer is in an inertial frame. Time expansion will occur between
any two relative frames. A and B. If A's clock is truly running slow then
B's clock is truly running fast and vice versa. This eliminates the bogus SR
assertion that only the observer's clock is running fast.
This is true for the so-
called "twin paradox" and it is true for GPS, and it is experimentally
verified. IRT's prediction is not experimentally verified.
IRT is experimentally verified. From the GPS point of view the SR effect on
the ground clock is 7 us/day running fast.
Ken Seto
.
- References:
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- From: PD
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- From: PD
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- Prev by Date: Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 810 30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
- Next by Date: Re: photon animation
- Previous by thread: Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- Next by thread: Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|