Re: photon animation

On Feb 1, 9:19 am, kdth...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 31, 2:59 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Jan 30, 11:23 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Y.Porat wrote:
thing I explain to everyone else.

E = mc^2 is a special case of the more general energy relation E^2 =
[mc^2]^2 + [pc]^2. Photons are massless,
------------------------------------

there are some people here that nominated themselves
asthe priests of science
even if not having even a Bsc!!

You say that like it makes a difference. I may not have my BS yet, but
I am *still* more educated than you.

I would like to remind you that you have _no_ education in physics and
you have _no_ right to talk the way you do.

calling others morons while they themselves are nasty morons
and as usual
thedevil is in
WRONG BASIC ASSUMPTIONS!!

wrong assumption no one:
''> E = mc^2 is a special case of the more general energy relation E^2
=
[mc^2]^2 + [pc]^2. Photons are massless,

that formula does not apply to the photon
it is even not the orriginal formula of Einstein!!
it is only for a mixture of a case with particles plus photon
and that misuse is a source of huge mistakes

Lets see...my understanding is consistent with not only how it was
taught to me from actual physics classes in the process of obtaining a
physics degree, but how it is used by actual physicists. It also has
the virtue of being self-consistent with everything else that was
taught to me.

On the other hand, we have your conflicting interpretation that nobody
agrees with which nobody taught to you. You have no physics education,
in fact you are a retired _engineer_ who has never had a reason to be
taught relativity.

wrong basic assumption No2

PHOTONS ARE NOT THE MEDITATORS OF THE ELECTRIC FIELD!!

only God knowes whointroduces that infintile expalnation
9may be -- while you disconnect an electric field
**you see aspark*
yetto go from that to the self confident assumption that
it is photons that make the electric field
is as i saied - infantile!!

I never had nor ever will expect _you_ to understand exchange forces.
It is like arguing about exchange forces with someone who has no
education in physics.

the phton that moves in a straight line
CANNOT BE ANY ATTRACTION AGENT!!!

Really?

What about the Casimir effect? How do you explain that?

and while you have so many wrong basic assumption
why wonder that you are talking nonsens!!
not only takling but selling it to others so assertiverly as a
little crook !!

AND CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE ADVANCE OF SCIENCE !!!
now it whant help you and your scince crooks
more and more people open their eyes:

How would you know? You aren't a scientist.

you can cheat someone all his life
you can cheat everybody just once

**but you cant cheat everybody forever**!!!!

ps
save youself the answer
it is more than expected word by word!!

so E = pc - as demanded.
Photons are massless through theory and experiment, neither of which
you are familiar with. I'm not exactly sure how to prove this simple

see the dimensions of momentum little idiot parrot

Why?

So you can go on a little tirade about how you have "proved" photons
have mass through dimensional analysis rather than experiment?

Go read this page:http://www.phys.lsu.edu/students/kristina/PhMass/
PhMass.html

Yes, the equations are hard to read. Not that it matters, you couldn't
understand them anyway.

Y.Porat
------------------------------- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

-----------------------
the only little fucker student
tha is talking all day about his education
is Erick Gisse
that tried to appear in two names
(the second one is Jower!!
first condition for being a serious scientist
is honesty
and even in that th Little crook failed!!

now learning until sub graduation
does not make you a scientist
the most you can be is a little pompous farter
of 22 years
such a little farter that wants to teach much more experienced people
in many ways than himself
is a good indication that the boy is disturbed
now little parrot and crook:
you can talk until tomorrow and wave your hands
that you understand how photons
that move in straight lines make any attraction force
but it will not make you a smaller little crook!
you dont understand it beside the mathematical jonglaring
that could somehow get out of some show
of success
but failed in doing more advance
because it is physically wrong!
a little parrot like you cant understand physics
because you was educated on parroting mathematics.and about the mass
of the photon:

if it has momentum it has mass
got it idiot ::
see the dimension of momentum
no crook including a little one like you
will be able cheat about it unless he is a lawyer crook
and not a physicist!!
so now
go teach your parrots physics
because here you are too much a little farter
to really make advance of science!!

and
*most people here already notices
who realy you are
and what is your real worth**
beside disturbing others!!
so
as for now
go finish your Bsc
and gop on learning
and even then
it is a big doubt if you are going to be a serious scientist
(may be a little parrots teacher)

Y.P
----------------------- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

A scientist must keep his data accurate in order to have validity of
his theoretical basis and conclusions. Eric is far too dishonest to
actually be a scientist. You can see this as he always twist the truth
a little bit in his posts for the greater effect he thinks he can
achieve. The sad thing is he'll probably do really well in the
charlatan fields of theoretical science. Since he is not honest or
interested in the truth, he will not question bull*** when it is in
front of him, and will gladly repeat any false bull***, to tote the
line of the charlatan creed that maintains it's charlatanism by
certified charlatan peer review.

Deatherage

You can't even work basic examples in classical physics, death-rage. I
gave you a simple charge distribution and you couldn't even compute
the electric field from that.

Given that you can't explain anything from classical mechanics,
classical E&M, either of the relativities, or quantum theory without
getting it wrong, I fail to see why anyone should listen to what you
have to say. Why don't you explain why people should listen to _you_
rather than someone who is educated.

.

Loading