Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator


"Mitchell Jones" :<mjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote
news:mjones-4A2505.13330206022007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1170745219.820301.244910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Feb 5, 6:06 pm, Mitchell Jones <mjo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <epr12a$c2...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

carlip-nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
frankli...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

[...]
I was looking for something like "Why gravity can't be the
electrostatic force", but I find almost nothing in the literature
or the web.

In literature is Aepinus-Franklin theory.

The simplest reason is this: in gravity, all masses attract, while
in electrostatics, like charges repel.

For Aepinus and Franklin too.

Thomas Barnes, as I noted, is the
first person, to my knowledge,

To my knowledge F. Aepinus and B. Franklin

who recognized the possibility that the
attractive force might slightly exceed the repulsive one.

I promised to consider the other idea. I was thinking about Aepinus-
Franklin theory. It seems that the experiment is adequate to prove this
theory. Tomorrow I will send more.
S*


.