Re: magnetmotor
- From: "gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Feb 2007 09:28:53 -0800
On Feb 8, 6:12 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
<phineaspuddled...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1170954450.629869.45...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm using google groups.
I guessed that. So, why haven 't you built this miraculous device and fed
countless Jigawatts back into the Dutch National Grid yet?
--
<-Coffee Boy-> = Preferably white, with two sugars
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.
Your own posts are undeniable evidence of what happens with inventions
like this.
This you cant try at home.
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/self-interaction.jpg
My 90 degree rule dictates:
"the combined forces of repulsion and attraction may 'add up' to
zero".
I stitch together an animated gif
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/fffxrr.gif
Now where is your debunk? With just knee jerking you are not going to
prove anything.
There is no escape, I know when I'm right. :---)
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Ben Newsam
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Androcles
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- References:
- magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- magnetmotor
- Prev by Date: Ask Life Forum
- Next by Date: Re: magnetmotor
- Previous by thread: Re: magnetmotor
- Next by thread: Re: magnetmotor
- Index(es):
Loading