Re: magnetmotor
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:36:10 GMT
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:53 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
<phineaspuddled...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <pGOyh.383140$1i1.177145@attbi_s72>,
Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Putting my words on your website without my permission, I see.So he's a plagarist too. Bad Gaby, you're supposed to ask permission before
Get them off!
-Sam Wormley
doing that.
More intellectual dishonesty!
Your reviews are important to show how real scientists respond to
ideas.
Perhaps you don't get it... physics has advanced enough over the
last two centuries to understand why perpetual motion machine
can't work. It wouldn't hurt you to do some self education gdewilde.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- References:
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: magnetmotor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: magnetmotor
- Prev by Date: Re: magnetmotor
- Next by Date: Re: magnetmotor
- Previous by thread: Re: magnetmotor
- Next by thread: Re: magnetmotor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|