Re: basic question about light
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:18:26 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1171151578.342519.102300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 10, 2:25 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1171133064.163815.323460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I asked:
Are TV signals absorbed by aluminium molecules in the antenna?
Answered 3 times already.
Yes, so you agree that molecules do not absorb all EM radiation.
No, nor did I ever say so. However, when any particular photon is
absorbed,
it is 100% gone.
Absorbed by a hogment molecule. Ever heard of electron microscopes?
Its energy is translated into an excited state.
That's what happens in an antenna.
In the case of visual pigments, as I posted from several websites,
the energy of the photon is used to change the shape of the
pigment molecule.
My ex-girlfriend suffered from type II diabetes.
http://medweb.bham.ac.uk/easdec/laserdiabetic_retinopathy.html
I suppose as a layman trying to be a physicist you'd call that
"changing shape".
A microwave oven will change the shape of popcorn, too.
Its energy is translated into an excited state. Pop pop pop...
I call it "cooking". You have a hard time with ordinary words,
don't you, Poe?
So now that we know the answer to your question is "no", I'll
just repeat my original statement:
[A photon] is absorbed by a pigment molecule in your retina.
http://www.catalase.com/retina.gif
Those rods and cones are antennae.
No, they really aren't.
Humpty Roberts let out a great sigh.
" <sigh>", he said.
"The nuances of English. I was discussing the usage of words and
not the concepts they represent."
-- Tom Humpty Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
news:ZDmYf.51582$2O6.5573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, they really are.
They are not elephantment,
hogment or dogment molecules, nor are the optic nerve fibres attached
to the (reflective - check out a cat's eye) pigment layer.
The problem is biologists know less physics than Tom Roberts
If you'd actually read the quotes I provided, you'd learn that
vertebrate visual reception begins with a photon causing a
molecule to change shape.
I don't believe word soup, it was a load of crap. Go play
in your sandbox with one of these:
http://www.transformerland.com/image/optimusprime.jpg
That then induces a series of enzyme-catalyzed reactions.
Nothing like that happens in an antenna.
Nothing like that happens in an antenna, but they do operate.
You got something right for a change, Blind Poe.
You will find a description of photon absorption followed by molecular
shape change, followed by the enzyme cascade, in any description
of how light is transduced in the retina.
You will not find a description of rods and cones as "antennae".
Humpty Roberts let out a great sigh.
" <sigh>", he said.
"The nuances of English. I was discussing the usage of words and
not the concepts they represent."
-- Tom Humpty Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
news:ZDmYf.51582$2O6.5573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Of course not, biologists and biochemists know very little physics
and you know none. 'Antenna' doesn't belong in their word soup,
even though that's what a rod or cone is. Same meat, different gravy.
Now I'm going to change the shape of some popcorn. Want some?
Oops, there was a pin in the nuker. It sparked. Perhaps it was
an antenna.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- References:
- basic question about light
- From: Aaron
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Androcles
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Androcles
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Androcles
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Androcles
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Androcles
- Re: basic question about light
- From: Randy Poe
- basic question about light
- Prev by Date: Re: Admit it Randy, otherwise I'll take you for the fool that you are.
- Next by Date: Re: http://www.stj911.com Serious researchers wanted
- Previous by thread: Re: basic question about light
- Next by thread: Re: basic question about light
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|