Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- From: "gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Feb 2007 10:35:21 -0800
On Feb 11, 6:59 pm, Prai Jei <pvstowns...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Black (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<1171171294.780830.13...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The design for this machine will be posted weekly to sci.physics by an
auto-posting bot. The flames boil water, producing pressurized steam,
which turns a turbine, which in turn powers an electrical generator,
which provides the power needed for the first step. I am currently
seeking contributions for an initial test run.
You will need to build a working model before any financial backers would be
interested.
--
Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Contains moderate language. Always read the label. Keep out of children.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
nonsense, should talk for yourself.
look:
http://www.steorn.net/about/investor/
There are multiple millions invested here.
So you basically claim heavier then air machines are an impossibility!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- References:
- Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- From: Jim Black
- Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- From: Prai Jei
- Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- Prev by Date: Re: Energy and Mass
- Next by Date: Re: What is a photon?
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|