Re: basic question about light


"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1171215731.370534.262640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 11, 12:22 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1171212946.233273.315160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 10, 10:18 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1171151578.342519.102300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 10, 2:25 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1171133064.163815.323460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I asked:
Are TV signals absorbed by aluminium molecules in the antenna?

Answered 3 times already.

Yes, so you agree that molecules do not absorb all EM radiation.

No, nor did I ever say so. However, when any particular photon is
absorbed,
it is 100% gone.

Absorbed by a hogment molecule. Ever heard of electron microscopes?

You didn't answer the question, troll. You were too busy snipping
and missed it.
Ever heard of electron microscopes?

Yes. Relevance?

Size of the electron v size of the photon. You get a lot less resolution
with infrared photons and radio photons, makes it harder to read licence
plates from police helicopters. You need giraffement molecules to
absorb IR and whalement molecules to absorb radio, pigment molecules
only work for visible light and bugment molecules are needed for
X-ray.
Electron microscopes can absorb electrons with ordinary molecules.
Utah is the Outback of America, isn't it? Bit like Queensland,
they'll tell you any old *** as long as it sounds good.




.

Quantcast