Re: Proposal for a perpetual motion machine

On Feb 11, 7:48 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 11, 6:59 pm, Prai Jei <pvstowns...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Black (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<1171171294.780830.13...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

The design for this machine will be posted weekly to sci.physics by an
auto-posting bot. The flames boil water, producing pressurized steam,
which turns a turbine, which in turn powers an electrical generator,
which provides the power needed for the first step. I am currently
seeking contributions for an initial test run.
You will need to build a working model before any financial backers would be
interested.
--
Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Contains moderate language. Always read the label. Keep out of children.

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

nonsense, should talk for yourself.

look:

http://www.steorn.net/about/investor/

There are multiple millions invested here.

So you basically claim heavier then air machines are an impossibility!

Heavier than air machine don't violate the second law of
thermodynamics... Git yerself an education kid!

Oh lets assume you are sincere for a moment as this is one of your
more serious and more on topic comments. Lord Kelvin was talking the
same kind of rubbish you always do. It's a known factor. It means no-
one would or should ever take you seriously.

.

Relevant Pages