Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:57:40 -0800
In sci.physics, Sam Wormley
<swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:04:27 GMT
<v7RBh.1633$PD2.283@attbi_s22>:
Sam Wormley wrote:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics, Sam Wormley
<swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:28:35 GMT
<DJPBh.1308$PD2.1188@attbi_s22>:
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
If you think it can[']t work, then you are kindly requested to explainThere is a reason perpetual motion machines can't work. Learn
why.
thermodynamics...
Pedant Point:
Erm...no. That's not the reason PPMs don't work.
Thermo is a model of the Universe.
It's a darned *good* model, to be sure...but it doesn't
explain why PPMs can't work. As phrased, he asked why
we think it can't work; thermodynamics is in that case a
perfectly good answer. But one could also say "we think
satellites can't work because the Earth is flat".
Fortunately, we know the Earth is an oblate spheroid
(and satellites have helped determine its oblateness).
We also have quite a bit of evidence that the theory of
thermodynamics works.
But it doesn't really explain why.
"Perpetual motion machines violate one or both of the following two
laws of physics: the first law of thermodynamics and the second law
of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics is essentially a
statement of conservation of energy".
"The second law has several statements, the most intuitive of which
is that heat flows spontaneously from hotter to colder places; the
most well known is that entropy tends to increase, or at the least
stays the same; another statement is that no heat engine (an engine
which produces work while moving heat between two places) can be more
efficient than a Carnot heat engine. As a special case of this, any
machine operating in a closed cycle cannot only transform thermal
energy to work in a region of constant temperature".
Gaby's PPM involves accelerated magnetic fields generating EM
radiation loss and suffers from internal friction due to changing
stressed in the substrates holding the magnets, resulting in thermal
radiation losses. Even if there were frictionless bearings, either
loss brings the device to a halt, let along produce and free work!
That's assuming it even *starts*. Stevin's Principle
makes short work of that. :-)
But again, "laws" here aren't what make the Universe work;
it's what we observe of the Universe's workings. That was
my point, and a nitpick it was, at that.
At best, the patent describes a novel sort of motor
(since it includes power leads, the USPTO might have let
it go by). At worst, it's a PPM and should not have been
patented at all. As it is, the patent expired years back;
it was issued in 1976.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set<...> v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- References:
- permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Jim Black
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Sam Wormley
- permanent magnet motor
- Prev by Date: Self GeneratingIig Ignoramus
- Next by Date: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Previous by thread: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Next by thread: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|