Re: permanent magnet motor

On Feb 18, 5:28 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 17, 11:39 am, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip idiocy]



For those skilled in the art it should be obvious that I would love to
establish some exact math on this.

Why don't you tell us how much math and physics you have had?

So far you guys quoted me the laws of physics over and over again.

This is the physics I know on this subject.

The second law of thermodynamics prohibits the construction of a
perpetual motion machine "of the second kind."

There are two usual statements of this law.

Kelvin's formulation states that it is impossible for a system
operating in a cycle and in contact with one thermal reservoir to
perform positive work in the surroundings.

Clausius's formulation states that it is impossible for a system
operating in a cycle to produce positive heat flow from a colder body
to a hotter body.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SecondLawofThermodynamics.html

Holy nobelty William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin (aka - you can call me
Lord) is widely known from the scale of absolute temperature
measurement he claimed to have re-invented, Galileo Galilei invented a
rudimentary water thermometer in 1593. In 1714, Gabriel Fahrenheit
invented the first mercury thermometer, the modern thermometer.

VIP Kelvin also mentions: the conversion of heat (or caloric) into
mechanical effect is probably impossible, certainly undiscovered - but
a footnote signalled his first doubts about the caloric theory.

Here Mr Kelvin is measuring the impossible in doubts.

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." sad Lord Kelvin -
president of the Royal Society - 1895. Later crawled back by
antagonists into "technically impossible" because it was in his days.

Ptolemy believed the planets and Sun to orbit the in the order
Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn. This system became known
as the Ptolemaic system.

nonexistence speculations are never factual, their description of
perpetual motion is not to be taken seriously in any way.

On http://www.ajayonline.us/ we can read

" Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense
speculated it. "

In short he stole half then speculated the other half. (no math.)

Now you and your establishment have promoted his assumption to a law
but it was just that. "An assumption" and nothing else.

Don't you know the laws of physics?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: permanent magnet motor
    ... invented the first mercury thermometer, ... " If a particular law gets in the way, he sees no harm in going around ... You are into pacman not physics. ... First hand would be looking at the spinning apparatus. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: permanent magnet motor
    ... There are two usual statements of this law. ... operating in a cycle to produce positive heat flow from a colder body ... invented the first mercury thermometer, ... You are into pacman not physics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: permanent magnet motor
    ... There are two usual statements of this law. ... invented the first mercury thermometer, ... You are into pacman not physics. ... Second hand would be 1800 quotation ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia
    ... > physical law. ... it is true then that a Law of Free Fall is either ... the graduating requirements for a BS in physics don't ... auxillary math classes which would make groking GR less painful. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia
    ... > physical law. ... it is true then that a Law of Free Fall is either ... the graduating requirements for a BS in physics don't ... auxillary math classes which would make groking GR less painful. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)