Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: "gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Feb 2007 09:04:46 -0800
On Feb 18, 10:00 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 17, 9:31 pm, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
The Lorentz Force law absolutely denies magnetic forces doing work. I
have told you this over and over - the force is perpendicular to the
direction of movement so work is not done.
quote:
"Dr. Simanek's argument is that either the Cavorite motor, or its
electrostatic counterpart, do not actually change in any way as they
rotate. Therefore, he reasons, by Stevin's principle of virtual work,
no energy is gained during the rotation and either motor, once
started, will eventually stop because of friction, or, if we neglect
friction, neither motor provides useful output work." http://www.kilty.com/pmredux.htm
In the context of my invention this claim doesn't hold at all. I
explain here:
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor-it-cant-be
what word should use for accelerating mass as the result of
magnetism. I'm using magneto-interaction now but that sounds very
strange on an axle. Should I call it "virtual work"?... really?? Do
you think anyone will buy that? I'm trying not to laugh.....
You have no understanding of what you are arguing against.
You have no idea of what I do or do not understand. You could only
guess and a guess is just that. Your opinion is not factual because
you say it is. In the end David kills Goliath. That's how it goes.
LOL - I will use mind control and use my army of zombie scientists to
conquer the world. - easy - no evidence needed.
As soon as I can accomplish a decent mathematical analysis of my
apparatus I will have it evaluated by other physicians.
Don't you know the laws of physics?
To a level you will never achieve.
I appreciate your effort, thanks.
Then you should have no problem understanding Dr. Simanek's is wrong.
I claim that Friction = work
My evidence is very simple:
EBM makes free electricity by running an efficient electomotor that
(apparently) also has a lot of friction. They use the (apparently
free) heat to (apparently) push it over 100% efficiency.
http://www.gammamanager.com
Q18: How long does it take from ordering to commissioning a 5 MWe
Unit?
A18: Approximately 15 months for the 1st unit, and 12 months for
additional units.
They sell 5 megawatt units? huh?
You cant just dismiss this, it's very good physics by understatement.
Q19: What is the probability that the Technology will be
commercially useful?
A19: It is already "useful", the probability is 100 %.
Q21. What are the expected profits in USD over the life time of the
new technology?
A21: The pay-back of capital is less than 4 years for small units
(less than 10 MWe) and less than 3 years for larger units. The pay-
back period is expected to be shorter yet, after the automated
"robotic manufacturing" begins.
humm, yes? [Friction = Work] or No?
-.-
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor
----------
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress?tag=energy&list=1
.
- References:
- permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: permanent magnet motor
- From: Eric Gisse
- permanent magnet motor
- Prev by Date: Re: Measuring the mass of a black hole
- Next by Date: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Previous by thread: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Next by thread: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|