Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Feb 2007 23:06:18 -0800
Of course, as previously noted, I am not yet convinced that this
electromagnetic theory of gravity is true. My intent here is to defend
it as best I can, and see how successful I am. If electrogravity turns
out to be the conclusion of the strongest arguments, then I will of
course accept it. But I have not yet determined that to be the case.
--Mitchell Jones}***
Wow, for someone who is not yet convinced, you sure make a convincing
argument. I wonder what Steve Carlip has to say in response? Your
arguments really put some meat on the bones of an electrostatic
gravity argument. I'm not sure I agree with your statement that
photons are absorbed into an atom creating mass. I could believe that
a photon raises an electron energy level, thus making it "bigger" and
harder to push through the aether which increases mass, but there
should be no concept of energy being converted into matter or vice-
versa. Although, this is not a matter directly related to the
elecrostatic gravity hypothesis.
.
- References:
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: Mitchell Jones
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Prev by Date: Re: magnetmotor
- Next by Date: Re: permanent magnet motor
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Index(es):